Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions

Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions , or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods . Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145506
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions

Di Zhang, He Zhao, Changyong Liu, Shen Qu et al.
3 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Water Treatment and Disinfection
3.60
article

Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions

Di Zhang, He Zhao, Changyong Liu, Shen Qu, Hongbin Cao, Shaohua Guo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions , or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods . Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 508
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Shenhua Group (China) (CN), Institute of Process Engineering (CN), Ecological Consulting (Czechia) (CZ), China Shenhua Energy (China) (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.