Role of Valency and Defects in the Incorporation of Uranium into the Goethite [010] Surface: An Embedded Cluster Density Functional Theory Study

Incorporation of actinide species into iron (oxyhydr)oxides could present an environmentally secure method for preventing the release of actinides over an extended period, as would be the case in a number of radioactively contaminated land situations including surface, near-surface, and subsurface disposal and storage. Uranium is known to incorporate into iron (oxyhydr)oxides, including goethite, in a number of valence states, but the atomistic structures of these processes are unclear. In particular, it is increasingly reported that iron-containing minerals can reductively incorporate and stabilize the +V state of uranium, an oxidation state that is known to be unstable with respect to disproportionation. Here, we use density functional theory within the Periodic Electrostatic Embedded Cluster Method to model U(IV), U(V), and U(VI) incorporation into the pristine and iron-vacancy [010] surface and near-surface region of goethite. Solvated and unsolvated surfaces are studied, and the role of electron transfer from the lattice to uranium ions is explored. Comparisons are made with published X-ray absorption spectroscopic data, and we conclude that, based on the expected conditions for surface and near surface storage sites, both U(VI) and U(V) would incorporate into goethite as it transforms from ferrihydrite, forming two distinct structural types. We find that U(VI) incorporated into goethite may be reduced to U(V), where electron transfer occurs from oxygens surrounding iron vacancies and the incorporated uranium, reducing the U(VI) species to U(V). Both U(VI) and U(V) can incorporate into the surface of goethite with an adjacent iron vacancy, or U(V) can uniquely incorporate into the structure within the near-surface region, containing local but not immediately adjacent iron vacancies for charge compensation. Both of these incorporation schemes are little affected by the presence of a monolayer of surface water, suggesting that incorporation into goethite is a viable method to prevent uranium release into the aqueous surroundings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00064
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Valency and Defects in the Incorporation of Uranium into the Goethite [010] Surface: An Embedded Cluster Density Functional Theory Study

Chris Hatton, Louise S. Natrajan, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis, Angeliki Christodoulidou
4 citations
ACS Omega
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
2.15
article

Role of Valency and Defects in the Incorporation of Uranium into the Goethite [010] Surface: An Embedded Cluster Density Functional Theory Study

Chris Hatton, Louise S. Natrajan, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis, Angeliki Christodoulidou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Incorporation of actinide species into iron (oxyhydr)oxides could present an environmentally secure method for preventing the release of actinides over an extended period, as would be the case in a number of radioactively contaminated land situations including surface, near-surface, and subsurface disposal and storage. Uranium is known to incorporate into iron (oxyhydr)oxides, including goethite, in a number of valence states, but the atomistic structures of these processes are unclear. In particular, it is increasingly reported that iron-containing minerals can reductively incorporate and stabilize the +V state of uranium, an oxidation state that is known to be unstable with respect to disproportionation. Here, we use density functional theory within the Periodic Electrostatic Embedded Cluster Method to model U(IV), U(V), and U(VI) incorporation into the pristine and iron-vacancy [010] surface and near-surface region of goethite. Solvated and unsolvated surfaces are studied, and the role of electron transfer from the lattice to uranium ions is explored. Comparisons are made with published X-ray absorption spectroscopic data, and we conclude that, based on the expected conditions for surface and near surface storage sites, both U(VI) and U(V) would incorporate into goethite as it transforms from ferrihydrite, forming two distinct structural types. We find that U(VI) incorporated into goethite may be reduced to U(V), where electron transfer occurs from oxygens surrounding iron vacancies and the incorporated uranium, reducing the U(VI) species to U(V). Both U(VI) and U(V) can incorporate into the surface of goethite with an adjacent iron vacancy, or U(V) can uniquely incorporate into the structure within the near-surface region, containing local but not immediately adjacent iron vacancies for charge compensation. Both of these incorporation schemes are little affected by the presence of a monolayer of surface water, suggesting that incorporation into goethite is a viable method to prevent uranium release into the aqueous surroundings.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(17)
University of Manchester (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
2.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.