Scaling Advantage in Approximate Optimization with Quantum Annealing
Quantum annealing is a heuristic optimization algorithm that exploits quantum evolution to find low-energy states. Quantum annealers have scaled up in recent years to tackle increasingly larger and more highly connected discrete optimization and quantum simulation problems. Nevertheless, a computational quantum advantage in exact optimization using quantum annealing hardware has so far remained elusive. Here, we present evidence for a quantum annealing scaling advantage in approximate optimization. The advantage is relative to the top classical heuristic algorithm: parallel tempering with isoenergetic cluster moves (PT-ICM). The setting is a family of 2D spin-glass problems with high-precision spin-spin interactions. To achieve this advantage, we implement quantum annealing correction (QAC): an embedding of a bit-flip error-correcting code with energy penalties that leverages the properties of the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer to yield over 1,300 error-suppressed logical qubits on a degree-5 interaction graph. We generate random spin-glass instances on this graph and benchmark their time-to-epsilon, a generalization of the time-to-solution metric for low-energy states. We demonstrate that, with QAC, quantum annealing exhibits a scaling advantage over PT-ICM at sampling low-energy states with an optimality gap of at least 1.0%. This amounts to the first demonstration of an algorithmic quantum speedup in approximate optimization.
Authors
- Humberto Munoz-Bauza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-0124)
- Daniel A. Lidar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-1515)
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- California Southern University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physical Review Letters
- Published
- 2025-04-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.134.160601
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 29.77
Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- University of Southern California
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Ames Research Center
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Army Research Office
- Army Research Laboratory