Open-Source AI Algorithms: A Qualitative Study on Transparency, Bias Mitigation, and Ethical Accountability

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet their opaque and proprietary nature often perpetuates bias and undermines ethical accountability. This paper investigates open-sourcing as an approach to mitigate these challenges by enhancing transparency, fostering collaborative development, and enabling independent auditing. The literature review identifies critical issues in existing proprietary Open-source AI frameworks, including algorithmic bias, limited transparency, and ethical shortcomings, and assesses how open-source initiatives address these concerns. Employing qualitative methods, including case studies, thematic analysis, and a comparative evaluation of open-source versus proprietary models, this study reveals significant benefits of open-source AI, such as improved fairness, transparency, and increased public trust. However, it also highlights critical challenges, including intellectual property rights, potential misuse, and technical complexity. The paper concludes that open-sourcing, while beneficial, necessitates standardized auditing frameworks, robust governance policies, and broad stakeholder participation to ensure ethical integrity and accountability in AI development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science Architecture Technology and Environment
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63680/hgcfnnh854
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open-Source AI Algorithms: A Qualitative Study on Transparency, Bias Mitigation, and Ethical Accountability

Manisha More, Priti Bharambe, Vikas Mahandule, Yogita Sawant
1 citations
International Journal of Science Architecture Technology and Environment
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Open-Source AI Algorithms: A Qualitative Study on Transparency, Bias Mitigation, and Ethical Accountability

Manisha More, Priti Bharambe, Vikas Mahandule, Yogita Sawant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet their opaque and proprietary nature often perpetuates bias and undermines ethical accountability. This paper investigates open-sourcing as an approach to mitigate these challenges by enhancing transparency, fostering collaborative development, and enabling independent auditing. The literature review identifies critical issues in existing proprietary Open-source AI frameworks, including algorithmic bias, limited transparency, and ethical shortcomings, and assesses how open-source initiatives address these concerns. Employing qualitative methods, including case studies, thematic analysis, and a comparative evaluation of open-source versus proprietary models, this study reveals significant benefits of open-source AI, such as improved fairness, transparency, and increased public trust. However, it also highlights critical challenges, including intellectual property rights, potential misuse, and technical complexity. The paper concludes that open-sourcing, while beneficial, necessitates standardized auditing frameworks, robust governance policies, and broad stakeholder participation to ensure ethical integrity and accountability in AI development.

International Journal of Science Architecture Technology and Environment
G.S. Science, Arts And Commerce College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.