Comparative Analysis of Standard Time Reproducibility Performance for Very Long Baseline

In this paper, the standard time reproduction equipment deployed by the National Time Service Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Minsk, Belarus, was used as the reference, and the performance of the two different methods, satellite common-view and satellite all-view, was verified. Under the condition of a ultra-long baseline of 6,240 kilometers, the limitation of fewer satellites with longer baselines was broken, and the comparison method was improved to enhance the precision of common-view comparison method. The analysis results show that, under the same test environment and using visible satellites of both GPS and BDS systems, the standard time reproduction effect using satellite common-view is better than that using satellite all-view method, whether in the absolute deviation between the reproduced signal and the standard time signal or in the statistical standard deviation of the measurement results. The satellite common-view method used in this paper is superior to the satellite all-view method in terms of both absolute deviation and statistical standard deviation, which can provide reference for the next step of global super-long baseline standard time reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/itoec63606.2025.10967732
Primary Topic
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Standard Time Reproducibility Performance for Very Long Baseline

Ruiqiong Chen, Shumeng Luo, Zhixiong Zhao, Fan Duosheng et al.
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
article

Comparative Analysis of Standard Time Reproducibility Performance for Very Long Baseline

Ruiqiong Chen, Shumeng Luo, Zhixiong Zhao, Fan Duosheng, Ya Liu, Lingda Meng
article en

Abstract

In this paper, the standard time reproduction equipment deployed by the National Time Service Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Minsk, Belarus, was used as the reference, and the performance of the two different methods, satellite common-view and satellite all-view, was verified. Under the condition of a ultra-long baseline of 6,240 kilometers, the limitation of fewer satellites with longer baselines was broken, and the comparison method was improved to enhance the precision of common-view comparison method. The analysis results show that, under the same test environment and using visible satellites of both GPS and BDS systems, the standard time reproduction effect using satellite common-view is better than that using satellite all-view method, whether in the absolute deviation between the reproduced signal and the standard time signal or in the statistical standard deviation of the measurement results. The satellite common-view method used in this paper is superior to the satellite all-view method in terms of both absolute deviation and statistical standard deviation, which can provide reference for the next step of global super-long baseline standard time reproduction.

Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), National Time Service Center (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Standard Time Reproducibility Performance for Very Long Baseline — Ruiqiong Chen, Shumeng Luo, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS