An Extensive Analysis of Match-Tracking Methods for ARTMAP

This paper identifies and studies five match-tracking (MT) methods in the adaptive resonance theory (ART) literature and conducts a detailed comparative analysis of these in ARTMAP applications. We focus on model performance for each MT method with respect to time and space efficiency as well as classification accuracy. Experimental results indicate that one MT variant, used in ARTMAP applications for the first time in this work, provides significant improvements in computational efficiency: depending on the ARTMAP variant, it was able to achieve up to one order of magnitude reduction in both time and space requirements, albeit with a compromise in accuracy, relative to the most accurate MT variant. Furthermore, these results reveal the absence of a universally accuracy-optimal MT algorithm, suggesting that the optimal choice is dependent on the specific ARTMAP architecture and the dataset characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cihm64979.2025.10969482
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Extensive Analysis of Match-Tracking Methods for ARTMAP

Leonardo Enzo Brito da Silva, Niklas Melton, Donald C. Wunsch
1 citations
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
1.28
article

An Extensive Analysis of Match-Tracking Methods for ARTMAP

Leonardo Enzo Brito da Silva, Niklas Melton, Donald C. Wunsch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper identifies and studies five match-tracking (MT) methods in the adaptive resonance theory (ART) literature and conducts a detailed comparative analysis of these in ARTMAP applications. We focus on model performance for each MT method with respect to time and space efficiency as well as classification accuracy. Experimental results indicate that one MT variant, used in ARTMAP applications for the first time in this work, provides significant improvements in computational efficiency: depending on the ARTMAP variant, it was able to achieve up to one order of magnitude reduction in both time and space requirements, albeit with a compromise in accuracy, relative to the most accurate MT variant. Furthermore, these results reveal the absence of a universally accuracy-optimal MT algorithm, suggesting that the optimal choice is dependent on the specific ARTMAP architecture and the dataset characteristics.

Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Extensive Analysis of Match-Tracking Methods for ARTMAP — Leonardo Enzo Brito da Silva, Niklas Melton, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS