Aβ <sub>42/40</sub> and p-tau 181 as disease biomarkers in atypical Alzheimer's disease

BackgroundStudies suggest that plasma Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers may aid in the overall diagnosis of AD, but their utility among patients with atypical clinical presentations of AD are unknown.ObjectiveThe main objective of this study was to determine the relationship between amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau plasma biomarkers and PET measures of both Aβ and tau in atypical AD. The secondary objective was to determine if plasma biomarkers could differentiate patients with different atypical AD phenotypes and whether they were related to measures of disease severity.MethodsWe assessed whether plasma p-tau 181 and Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> were associated with Aβ and tau PET uptake, clinical phenotype and severity in 77 patients with PET biomarker-confirmed atypical AD.ResultsPlasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio showed positive associations with tau PET uptake, with higher (more normal) Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio associated with higher tau uptake; the ratio was not associated with Aβ PET. No associations were noted with plasma p-tau 181. Plasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio and p-tau 181 concentrations were not associated with AD phenotype or cognitive severity.ConclusionPlasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio and p-tau 181 concentrations are not associated with amyloid or tau PET or with clinical severity among individuals presenting with atypical AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251333450
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aβ 42/40 and p-tau 181 as disease biomarkers in atypical Alzheimer's disease

Val J. Lowe, Clifford R. Jack, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Keith A. Josephs et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Aβ 42/40 and p-tau 181 as disease biomarkers in atypical Alzheimer's disease

Val J. Lowe, Clifford R. Jack, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Keith A. Josephs, Mary M. Machulda, Matthew L. Senjem, Christopher G. Schwarz, Neha Atulkumar Singh, Jennifer L. Whitwell, Michelle M. Mielke, Danni Li
article en

Abstract

BackgroundStudies suggest that plasma Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers may aid in the overall diagnosis of AD, but their utility among patients with atypical clinical presentations of AD are unknown.ObjectiveThe main objective of this study was to determine the relationship between amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau plasma biomarkers and PET measures of both Aβ and tau in atypical AD. The secondary objective was to determine if plasma biomarkers could differentiate patients with different atypical AD phenotypes and whether they were related to measures of disease severity.MethodsWe assessed whether plasma p-tau 181 and Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> were associated with Aβ and tau PET uptake, clinical phenotype and severity in 77 patients with PET biomarker-confirmed atypical AD.ResultsPlasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio showed positive associations with tau PET uptake, with higher (more normal) Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio associated with higher tau uptake; the ratio was not associated with Aβ PET. No associations were noted with plasma p-tau 181. Plasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio and p-tau 181 concentrations were not associated with AD phenotype or cognitive severity.ConclusionPlasma Aβ<sub>42/40</sub> ratio and p-tau 181 concentrations are not associated with amyloid or tau PET or with clinical severity among individuals presenting with atypical AD.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 105(3)
University of Minnesota (US), Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Wake Forest University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.