Differentiating formation models with new dynamical masses for the PDS 70 protoplanets

Hot- and cold-start planet formation models predict differing luminosities for the young, bright planets that direct-imaging surveys are most sensitive to. However, precise mass estimates are required to distinguish between these models observationally. The presence of two directly imaged planets, PDS 70 b and c, in the PDS 70 protoplanetary disk provides us a unique opportunity for dynamical mass measurements since the masses of these planets are currently poorly constrained. Fitting orbital parameters to new astrometry of these planets, taken with VLTI/GRAVITY in the K band, we find 2 σ dynamical upper mass limits of 4.9 M Jup for b and 13.6 M Jup for c. Adding astrometry from the newly proposed planet candidate PDS 70 d into our model, we determine 2 σ dynamical upper mass limits of 5.3 M Jup , 7.5 M Jup , and 2.2 M Jup for b, c, and the candidate d, respectively. However, N -body analysis of the orbits’ fit in this case suggests that the inclusion of d makes the system unstable. Using the upper mass limits for b and c, we rule out the coldest-start formation models for both planets, calculating minimum post-formation entropies ( S i ) of 9.5 k B / baryon and 8.4 k B / baryon, respectively. This places PDS 70 b and c on the growing list of directly imaged planets inconsistent with cold-start formation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553936
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiating formation models with new dynamical masses for the PDS 70 protoplanets

Jens Kammerer, Gabriel-Dominique Marleau, Jonas Sauter, S. Lacour et al.
5 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astro and Planetary Science
5.77
article

Differentiating formation models with new dynamical masses for the PDS 70 protoplanets

Jens Kammerer, Gabriel-Dominique Marleau, Jonas Sauter, S. Lacour, Sasha Hinkley, M. Houllé, D. Mesa, Emily Rickman, Laura Kreidberg, Sarah Blunt, G. P. P. L. Otten, Remo Burn, Valentin Christiaens, David Trevascus, Iain Hammond, R. Gratton, Elisabeth C. Matthews, A. Vigan, G. Chauvin, Jason Wang, Mickael Bonnefoy, J. Sánchez-Bermúdez, Wolfgang Brandner, Mathias Nowak, William O. Balmer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Hot- and cold-start planet formation models predict differing luminosities for the young, bright planets that direct-imaging surveys are most sensitive to. However, precise mass estimates are required to distinguish between these models observationally. The presence of two directly imaged planets, PDS 70 b and c, in the PDS 70 protoplanetary disk provides us a unique opportunity for dynamical mass measurements since the masses of these planets are currently poorly constrained. Fitting orbital parameters to new astrometry of these planets, taken with VLTI/GRAVITY in the K band, we find 2 σ dynamical upper mass limits of 4.9 M Jup for b and 13.6 M Jup for c. Adding astrometry from the newly proposed planet candidate PDS 70 d into our model, we determine 2 σ dynamical upper mass limits of 5.3 M Jup , 7.5 M Jup , and 2.2 M Jup for b, c, and the candidate d, respectively. However, N -body analysis of the orbits’ fit in this case suggests that the inclusion of d makes the system unstable. Using the upper mass limits for b and c, we rule out the coldest-start formation models for both planets, calculating minimum post-formation entropies ( S i ) of 9.5 k B / baryon and 8.4 k B / baryon, respectively. This places PDS 70 b and c on the growing list of directly imaged planets inconsistent with cold-start formation.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 698
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Astro and Planetary Science
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.