The process matters: Exploring public participation in solar energy projects in Brazil and Portugal

The ongoing climate crisis increases the priority to rapidly deploy renewable energy technologies. Solar energy generation is in continuous growth, raising concerns over local-level effects. For instance, large-scale solar photovoltaic projects may overlook the place-sensitive nature, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical conditions, compromising a just energy transition. Considered win-win solutions from a national perspective, potentially catering to an affordable energy supply with low environmental impacts, solar projects may be assessed concerning civic, community, and stakeholders' expectations for participation. An inclusive process must consider the opinions of different stakeholders, guaranteeing procedural justice (i.e. access to information, representation legitimacy, influence in timely decision-making, and power relations among actors), through effective social participation. This work relies on the energy justice framework, with a specific focus on procedural justice aspects to investigate stakeholder perspectives on centralized and decentralized solar photovoltaic generation models. While comparing evidence from 47 interviews and fieldwork in Brazil and Portugal, this study identifies social participation expectations and procedures to safeguard justice aspects. The novelty lies in offering an original comparison of energy justice practices on solar generation models across geographies. The key question is to understand how procedural justice is being enacted in practice, proposing policy actions to promote participation, and avoid tensions and conflicts that may delay the energy transition implementation. It concludes that to achieve a just energy transition, a fast-paced renewable energy deployment is critical, but the process matters. • Explores tensions of top-down solar energy deployment with effective participation • Relies on 47 interviews and field observations in Brazil and Portugal • Compares procedural justice aspects of centralized and decentralized solar projects • Identifies participation expectations and procedures to safeguard justice aspects • Proposes policy actions promoting justice in the rapid expansion of solar energy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104078
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The process matters: Exploring public participation in solar energy projects in Brazil and Portugal

Inês Campos, Luiz Eduardo Rielli
6 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
25.21
article

The process matters: Exploring public participation in solar energy projects in Brazil and Portugal

Inês Campos, Luiz Eduardo Rielli
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The ongoing climate crisis increases the priority to rapidly deploy renewable energy technologies. Solar energy generation is in continuous growth, raising concerns over local-level effects. For instance, large-scale solar photovoltaic projects may overlook the place-sensitive nature, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical conditions, compromising a just energy transition. Considered win-win solutions from a national perspective, potentially catering to an affordable energy supply with low environmental impacts, solar projects may be assessed concerning civic, community, and stakeholders' expectations for participation. An inclusive process must consider the opinions of different stakeholders, guaranteeing procedural justice (i.e. access to information, representation legitimacy, influence in timely decision-making, and power relations among actors), through effective social participation. This work relies on the energy justice framework, with a specific focus on procedural justice aspects to investigate stakeholder perspectives on centralized and decentralized solar photovoltaic generation models. While comparing evidence from 47 interviews and fieldwork in Brazil and Portugal, this study identifies social participation expectations and procedures to safeguard justice aspects. The novelty lies in offering an original comparison of energy justice practices on solar generation models across geographies. The key question is to understand how procedural justice is being enacted in practice, proposing policy actions to promote participation, and avoid tensions and conflicts that may delay the energy transition implementation. It concludes that to achieve a just energy transition, a fast-paced renewable energy deployment is critical, but the process matters. • Explores tensions of top-down solar energy deployment with effective participation • Relies on 47 interviews and field observations in Brazil and Portugal • Compares procedural justice aspects of centralized and decentralized solar projects • Identifies participation expectations and procedures to safeguard justice aspects • Proposes policy actions promoting justice in the rapid expansion of solar energy

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 125
Sustainability Institute (ZA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.