Understanding Contexts and Power Relations in Collaborative Planning in China

While collaborative planning theory has been criticized for overlooking contexts and power differentials, few studies clarify what “context” means and why it matters for power. This study develops a conceptual framework to understand contexts and power relations in collaborative planning by bridging insights from planning literature, public administration, and political science. This framework is validated through an analysis of China's collaborative planning practices. The findings highlight how diverse institutional and local contexts significantly shape power dynamics among governments, private sectors, civil society, planners, and other actors. This leads to the heterogeneous nature of collaborative planning practices in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Planning Literature
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122251327119
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Contexts and Power Relations in Collaborative Planning in China

Yanliu Lin
Journal of Planning Literature
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Understanding Contexts and Power Relations in Collaborative Planning in China

Yanliu Lin
article en

Abstract

While collaborative planning theory has been criticized for overlooking contexts and power differentials, few studies clarify what “context” means and why it matters for power. This study develops a conceptual framework to understand contexts and power relations in collaborative planning by bridging insights from planning literature, public administration, and political science. This framework is validated through an analysis of China's collaborative planning practices. The findings highlight how diverse institutional and local contexts significantly shape power dynamics among governments, private sectors, civil society, planners, and other actors. This leads to the heterogeneous nature of collaborative planning practices in China.

Journal of Planning Literature
Utrecht University (NL)
H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding Contexts and Power Relations in Collaborative Planning in China — Yanliu Lin · Journal of Planning Literature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS