Exploring How Organizational Actors Experience Evaluation and Its Influence: A Q-Methodological Study

This article contributes to research on evaluation by examining how organizational actors respond to and use evaluation imposed on them within an evaluation system. Drawing on Henry and Mark's theory of evaluation influence, this study uses Q-methodology to explore how staff within English higher education providers experience evaluation and its influence on their widening participation practice and strategy decision-making. The experiences of organizational actors are examined and classified into four types: strategic practitioners, pragmatic practitioners, staff with indirect involvement in widening participation, and evaluation enthusiasts. Through analyzing these experiences, the findings illustrate the diverse ways organizational actors are influenced by evaluation within evaluation systems. To deepen our understanding of evaluation influence in the contexts of evaluation systems, this article recommends explicitly embedding organizational theories into future theories of evaluation influence and provides suggestions for future research on the topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140251334327
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring How Organizational Actors Experience Evaluation and Its Influence: A Q-Methodological Study

Catherine A. Kelly
1 citations
American Journal of Evaluation
Q Methodology Applications
2.11
article

Exploring How Organizational Actors Experience Evaluation and Its Influence: A Q-Methodological Study

Catherine A. Kelly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article contributes to research on evaluation by examining how organizational actors respond to and use evaluation imposed on them within an evaluation system. Drawing on Henry and Mark's theory of evaluation influence, this study uses Q-methodology to explore how staff within English higher education providers experience evaluation and its influence on their widening participation practice and strategy decision-making. The experiences of organizational actors are examined and classified into four types: strategic practitioners, pragmatic practitioners, staff with indirect involvement in widening participation, and evaluation enthusiasts. Through analyzing these experiences, the findings illustrate the diverse ways organizational actors are influenced by evaluation within evaluation systems. To deepen our understanding of evaluation influence in the contexts of evaluation systems, this article recommends explicitly embedding organizational theories into future theories of evaluation influence and provides suggestions for future research on the topic.

American Journal of EvaluationVol. 46(4)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Q Methodology Applications
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring How Organizational Actors Experience Evaluation and Its Influence: A Q-Methodological Study — Catherine A. Kelly · American Journal of Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS