Selection of Biomass Resources with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: Alternatives for Sustainable Energy Production

Selecting the most sustainable and efficient biomass resource for energy production requires a strategic multi-criteria decision-making approach. This study evaluates four biomass alternatives—plant-based, forest/wood-based, animal-based, and urban/industrial waste biomass—across economic, environmental, technical, and social dimensions, using twelve sub-criteria. The Fuzzy Bonferroni Aggregation Operator consolidated data, while the Fuzzy Weight by Envelope and Slope (F-WENSLO) method prioritized main and sub-criteria, and the Fuzzy Ranking Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (F-RAWEC) method ranked alternatives. Results identified animal-based biomass (Qᵢ = 1.1228) as the optimal choice due to its superior energy efficiency and economic benefits, followed by plant-based (Qᵢ = 1.0989), forest/wood-based (Qᵢ = 1.0919), and urban/industrial waste biomass (Qᵢ = 1.0848). The latter’s low ranking reflects environmental and compatibility challenges. The study underscores the need for holistic biomass selection, balancing economic, technical, environmental, and social factors to inform sustainable energy policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Operations Intelligence
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi31202537
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection of Biomass Resources with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: Alternatives for Sustainable Energy Production

Gülay Demir
8 citations
Journal of Operations Intelligence
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
16.85
article

Selection of Biomass Resources with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: Alternatives for Sustainable Energy Production

Gülay Demir
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Selecting the most sustainable and efficient biomass resource for energy production requires a strategic multi-criteria decision-making approach. This study evaluates four biomass alternatives—plant-based, forest/wood-based, animal-based, and urban/industrial waste biomass—across economic, environmental, technical, and social dimensions, using twelve sub-criteria. The Fuzzy Bonferroni Aggregation Operator consolidated data, while the Fuzzy Weight by Envelope and Slope (F-WENSLO) method prioritized main and sub-criteria, and the Fuzzy Ranking Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (F-RAWEC) method ranked alternatives. Results identified animal-based biomass (Qᵢ = 1.1228) as the optimal choice due to its superior energy efficiency and economic benefits, followed by plant-based (Qᵢ = 1.0989), forest/wood-based (Qᵢ = 1.0919), and urban/industrial waste biomass (Qᵢ = 1.0848). The latter’s low ranking reflects environmental and compatibility challenges. The study underscores the need for holistic biomass selection, balancing economic, technical, environmental, and social factors to inform sustainable energy policies.

Journal of Operations IntelligenceVol. 3(1)
Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
16.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.