From the Master's Tool to an Instrument of Change: HCI Design Method Subversion
The dominant view of HCI design methods, aligned with profit-driven goals, reinforces existing power structures and economic inequality. Inspired by Aude Lorde's assertion that "the master's tools cannot dismantle the master's house,” this paper examines their potential to enable socially just, community-driven outcomes by subverting conventional methods like example mapping. We apply Amos Vogel's framework of subversion of form and content, using case study in cooperative and community land trust context. This research represents a novel approach as it specifically focuses on subverting a conventional design method to align with cooperative principles and economic justice. Findings highlight the importance of inclusivity, mutual aid, and community-centred processes in shifting technology design goals toward equity and collective ownership.
Authors
- Alex Taylor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-3967)
- Sara Heitlinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6148-350X)
- Larisa Blazic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7651-3679)
Institutions
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- City St George's, University of London (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-04-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720035
- Primary Topic
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00