Designing Targeted Explanations for Heterogeneous Stakeholders - AI for Collaborative Use in the Railways

The opaqueness of AI continues to represent a significant challenge when designing safe and reliable high risk-AI-systems, particularly for collaborative use by multiple heterogeneous stakeholders. Explainability approaches are used to address this opacity by increasing transparency and interpretability of AI-based systems and thereby establishing human control over the AI-system. In order to be effective, these explainability approaches need to be targeted to needs of all involved stakeholders. We show with an example use case from the railway sector how work design can be combined with technology design for successful human-system integration. Through observation of work processes and interviews with stakeholders at an early stage of system development we can support the design of targeted explanations for high-risk AI systems used in complex collaborative settings by gaining in depth understanding of the respective work systems. We identified five relevant explainability approaches for a visual train inspection decision support system. Exploratory testing then showed preferences for some explanations over others, fostering the discussion on choosing appropriate and effective explanations for visual tasks and informing the design of a final visual train inspection interface prototype for future research and application in the railways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719927
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Targeted Explanations for Heterogeneous Stakeholders - AI for Collaborative Use in the Railways

Daniel Boos, Lena Schneider, Gudela Grote, Yaren Cakir
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Designing Targeted Explanations for Heterogeneous Stakeholders - AI for Collaborative Use in the Railways

Daniel Boos, Lena Schneider, Gudela Grote, Yaren Cakir
article en

Abstract

The opaqueness of AI continues to represent a significant challenge when designing safe and reliable high risk-AI-systems, particularly for collaborative use by multiple heterogeneous stakeholders. Explainability approaches are used to address this opacity by increasing transparency and interpretability of AI-based systems and thereby establishing human control over the AI-system. In order to be effective, these explainability approaches need to be targeted to needs of all involved stakeholders. We show with an example use case from the railway sector how work design can be combined with technology design for successful human-system integration. Through observation of work processes and interviews with stakeholders at an early stage of system development we can support the design of targeted explanations for high-risk AI systems used in complex collaborative settings by gaining in depth understanding of the respective work systems. We identified five relevant explainability approaches for a visual train inspection decision support system. Exploratory testing then showed preferences for some explanations over others, fostering the discussion on choosing appropriate and effective explanations for visual tasks and informing the design of a final visual train inspection interface prototype for future research and application in the railways.

ETH Zurich (CH), Swiss Federal Railways (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.