Beyond the surface: stylometric analysis of GPT-4o’s capacity for literary style imitation

Abstract This study aims to explore the ability of GPT-4o to imitate the literary style of renowned authors. Ernest Hemingway and Mary Shelley were selected due to their contrasting literary styles and their overall impact on world literature. Using three distinct prompting strategies—zero-shot generation, zero-shot imitation, and in-context learning—we generated forty-five stylistic imitations and analyzed them alongside the authors’ original texts. To ensure thematic consistency, we constrained the generated texts to shared narrative themes derived from the authors’ works. We used a distance-based approach to authorship attribution using the 1,000 most frequent words and cosine distance to explore how the large language model’s imitations were positioned in the multidimensional authorship space. Moreover, we exploited a random forest classifier and repeated the authorship attribution task to analyze the authorship distinctiveness of the GPT imitations further. We used a combination of Textual Complexity and Readability, Author Multilevel N-gram Profiles, Word Embeddings, and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count features. t-SNE visualizations further evaluated the stylistic alignment between original and GPT-generated texts. The findings reveal that while GPT-4o captures some surface-level stylistic elements of the authors, it struggles to fully replicate the depth and uniqueness of their stylometric signatures. Imitations generated via in-context learning showed improved alignment with the original authors but still exhibited significant overlap with generic GPT outputs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the surface: stylometric analysis of GPT-4o’s capacity for literary style imitation

George Mikros
1 citations
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Beyond the surface: stylometric analysis of GPT-4o’s capacity for literary style imitation

George Mikros
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to explore the ability of GPT-4o to imitate the literary style of renowned authors. Ernest Hemingway and Mary Shelley were selected due to their contrasting literary styles and their overall impact on world literature. Using three distinct prompting strategies—zero-shot generation, zero-shot imitation, and in-context learning—we generated forty-five stylistic imitations and analyzed them alongside the authors’ original texts. To ensure thematic consistency, we constrained the generated texts to shared narrative themes derived from the authors’ works. We used a distance-based approach to authorship attribution using the 1,000 most frequent words and cosine distance to explore how the large language model’s imitations were positioned in the multidimensional authorship space. Moreover, we exploited a random forest classifier and repeated the authorship attribution task to analyze the authorship distinctiveness of the GPT imitations further. We used a combination of Textual Complexity and Readability, Author Multilevel N-gram Profiles, Word Embeddings, and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count features. t-SNE visualizations further evaluated the stylistic alignment between original and GPT-generated texts. The findings reveal that while GPT-4o captures some surface-level stylistic elements of the authors, it struggles to fully replicate the depth and uniqueness of their stylometric signatures. Imitations generated via in-context learning showed improved alignment with the original authors but still exhibited significant overlap with generic GPT outputs.

Digital Scholarship in the HumanitiesVol. 40(2)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Qatar National Library
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.