A US Perspective on the ELI/<scp>Unidroit</scp> Model Rules of Civil Procedure

Abstract The European Law Institute (ELI) – International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Unidroit) Model Rules of Civil Procedure represent the most ambitious effort thus far to harmonize common-law and civil-law approaches to this vital topic. This article compares the new Model Rules to the US approach to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The two systems are remarkably close in some areas, such as the attitude toward judicial management of a case; differences persist in others, such as the recognition of a pre-commencement phase of litigation, the use of pre-trial discovery mechanisms, and the model for aggregate or collective litigation. Notwithstanding these differences, however, convergence has moved forward and is likely to continue to do so, with the help of the ELI and the American Law Institute, among many other significant institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uniform Law Review
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unaf018
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A US Perspective on the ELI/Unidroit Model Rules of Civil Procedure

Diane P. Wood
Uniform Law Review
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

A US Perspective on the ELI/Unidroit Model Rules of Civil Procedure

Diane P. Wood
article en

Abstract

Abstract The European Law Institute (ELI) – International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Unidroit) Model Rules of Civil Procedure represent the most ambitious effort thus far to harmonize common-law and civil-law approaches to this vital topic. This article compares the new Model Rules to the US approach to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The two systems are remarkably close in some areas, such as the attitude toward judicial management of a case; differences persist in others, such as the recognition of a pre-commencement phase of litigation, the use of pre-trial discovery mechanisms, and the model for aggregate or collective litigation. Notwithstanding these differences, however, convergence has moved forward and is likely to continue to do so, with the help of the ELI and the American Law Institute, among many other significant institutions.

Uniform Law ReviewVol. 30(1)
University of Chicago (US), United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A US Perspective on the ELI/<scp>Unidroit</scp> Model Rules of Civil Procedure — Diane P. Wood · Uniform Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS