How Website Owners Use Consent Management Platforms: An Interview Study

Website owners must bring their consent interfaces into compliance with EU privacy and data protection regulation. Previous research indicates consent interfaces are often designed to manipulate users, violating consent requirements under GDPR. However, little empirical work has investigated how website owners configure, implement, and maintain consent interfaces, or what causes their (non)compliance. We conducted 12 interviews with website owners in Denmark from websites where their compliance had improved over the course of three years. Our results show that while they cared about privacy and legal compliance, most knew or cared little about their consent interface. Rather, the configuration and maintenance of the interfaces happened in collaboration with a diverse network of actors, with third-party consent management platforms playing a central role. We discuss the implications of this distribution of responsibility for regulators aiming to improve compliance, for legal attribution of controllership, and for researchers untangling the incentive structures and power dynamics surrounding online privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720002
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Website Owners Use Consent Management Platforms: An Interview Study

Midas Nouwens, Kalle Kusk
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

How Website Owners Use Consent Management Platforms: An Interview Study

Midas Nouwens, Kalle Kusk
article en

Abstract

Website owners must bring their consent interfaces into compliance with EU privacy and data protection regulation. Previous research indicates consent interfaces are often designed to manipulate users, violating consent requirements under GDPR. However, little empirical work has investigated how website owners configure, implement, and maintain consent interfaces, or what causes their (non)compliance. We conducted 12 interviews with website owners in Denmark from websites where their compliance had improved over the course of three years. Our results show that while they cared about privacy and legal compliance, most knew or cared little about their consent interface. Rather, the configuration and maintenance of the interfaces happened in collaboration with a diverse network of actors, with third-party consent management platforms playing a central role. We discuss the implications of this distribution of responsibility for regulators aiming to improve compliance, for legal attribution of controllership, and for researchers untangling the incentive structures and power dynamics surrounding online privacy.

Aarhus University (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Website Owners Use Consent Management Platforms: An Interview Study — Midas Nouwens, Kalle Kusk · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS