The Potential of Quadratic Voting for Cohousing Communities

Quadratic voting (QV) is a means of making collective decisions that include and reflect the intensity of individual voter preferences. While QV has mainly been applied to legislative case studies, it is our conjecture that QV also holds potential for decision-making processes taking place in cohousing communities. To explore this conjecture, we conducted a situated design case study in which we introduced QV into the decision-making process of the Community Land Trust H-buurt, Amsterdam (NL). Our case study includes four situated actions taken from an embedded position in the community, and yielded data ranging from screenshots, sketch notes and photos, to a QV tool, ballot issues and voting data. In this paper, we describe our case study in more detail, report and discuss our results, and present our conclusion that cohousing is ripe for QV as well as recommendations to operationalize QV in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3706671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Potential of Quadratic Voting for Cohousing Communities

Tara Karpinski, Martijn de Waal, Michel van Dartel
1 citations
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
6.18
article

The Potential of Quadratic Voting for Cohousing Communities

Tara Karpinski, Martijn de Waal, Michel van Dartel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quadratic voting (QV) is a means of making collective decisions that include and reflect the intensity of individual voter preferences. While QV has mainly been applied to legislative case studies, it is our conjecture that QV also holds potential for decision-making processes taking place in cohousing communities. To explore this conjecture, we conducted a situated design case study in which we introduced QV into the decision-making process of the Community Land Trust H-buurt, Amsterdam (NL). Our case study includes four situated actions taken from an embedded position in the community, and yielded data ranging from screenshots, sketch notes and photos, to a QV tool, ballot issues and voting data. In this paper, we describe our case study in more detail, report and discuss our results, and present our conclusion that cohousing is ripe for QV as well as recommendations to operationalize QV in this domain.

Avans University of Applied Sciences (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.