When Scales Fail to Measure Up: How Not to Measure Social Media Privacy--Findings of a Representative Survey in 16 Countries

Privacy scales are scientific instruments measuring constructs, such as users’ concerns, preferences, or behaviour; however, the development and validation of privacy scales are often limited to populations in the Global North. This poses a challenge for evaluating and generalising the scale results in the Global South. We present the results of a replication study on the external validity of the Privacy-Defensive Behaviour Scale (PDBS) with a representative sample of 8140 participants from 16 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. Our results show that the PDBS, when administered in the MENA region, has a poor model fit, does not support the factor structure of the original scale, and exhibits low reliability and validity. Our results highlight the need for cross-cultural scale validation and adaptation. We discuss possible underlying reasons and best practices for scale validation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720138
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Scales Fail to Measure Up: How Not to Measure Social Media Privacy--Findings of a Representative Survey in 16 Countries

Ali Farooq, Bernard J. Jim Jansen, Habiba Farzand, Joni O. Salminen
2 citations
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
article

When Scales Fail to Measure Up: How Not to Measure Social Media Privacy--Findings of a Representative Survey in 16 Countries

Ali Farooq, Bernard J. Jim Jansen, Habiba Farzand, Joni O. Salminen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Privacy scales are scientific instruments measuring constructs, such as users’ concerns, preferences, or behaviour; however, the development and validation of privacy scales are often limited to populations in the Global North. This poses a challenge for evaluating and generalising the scale results in the Global South. We present the results of a replication study on the external validity of the Privacy-Defensive Behaviour Scale (PDBS) with a representative sample of 8140 participants from 16 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. Our results show that the PDBS, when administered in the MENA region, has a poor model fit, does not support the factor structure of the original scale, and exhibits low reliability and validity. Our results highlight the need for cross-cultural scale validation and adaptation. We discuss possible underlying reasons and best practices for scale validation studies.

University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Vaasa (FI)
Facebook
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Scales Fail to Measure Up: How Not to Measure Social Media Privacy--Findings of a Representative Survey in 16 Countries — Ali Farooq, Bernard J. Jim Jansen, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS