Digital Games For Conflict Mediation: a Study on The Developers’ Responsibility Practices and The Way Forward

Conflicts represent unwanted tensions between individuals, groups, and societies, being a pervasively defining dimension of global world politics. Existing approaches to mediate and resolve conflicts require all-encompassing, innovative practices appropriate to today’s world state and the ambition of becoming more sustainable. Traditional conflict mediation approaches (e.g., simulations) can gain potential from digital games, as information technologies are ubiquitous and games inherently afford conflict, strategy, collaboration, shared sense-making, and goal-setting. However, digital games can lead to misinformation, biases, data management, and online safety risks, calling for transparent responsibility practices, which are often unclear. To identify and understand responsibility principles and practices inherent to digital games for conflict mediation, we developed a systematic evidence synthesis in this initial study, collecting and analyzing the development processes of 26 conflict-mediation digital games. Our results comprise five practical recommendations, and a future research agenda to assist digital game developers in making sustainable HCI happen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720054
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Games For Conflict Mediation: a Study on The Developers’ Responsibility Practices and The Way Forward

Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Juho Hamari, Georgina Guillén, Nevena Sicevic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Digital Games For Conflict Mediation: a Study on The Developers’ Responsibility Practices and The Way Forward

Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Juho Hamari, Georgina Guillén, Nevena Sicevic
article en

Abstract

Conflicts represent unwanted tensions between individuals, groups, and societies, being a pervasively defining dimension of global world politics. Existing approaches to mediate and resolve conflicts require all-encompassing, innovative practices appropriate to today’s world state and the ambition of becoming more sustainable. Traditional conflict mediation approaches (e.g., simulations) can gain potential from digital games, as information technologies are ubiquitous and games inherently afford conflict, strategy, collaboration, shared sense-making, and goal-setting. However, digital games can lead to misinformation, biases, data management, and online safety risks, calling for transparent responsibility practices, which are often unclear. To identify and understand responsibility principles and practices inherent to digital games for conflict mediation, we developed a systematic evidence synthesis in this initial study, collecting and analyzing the development processes of 26 conflict-mediation digital games. Our results comprise five practical recommendations, and a future research agenda to assist digital game developers in making sustainable HCI happen.

Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.