The Effect of Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification on Medical Students’ Perspectives of Decision-Making AI: A Cancer Screening Case Study

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential to enhance healthcare decision-making but is limited by its 'black box' nature. Explainable AI (XAI) and Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) address these challenges by improving interpretability and reliability. Despite their potential, the impact of XAI and UQ on medical students’ perception of AI in healthcare remains unclear. This study explores the impact of XAI and UQ on medical students’ perceptions of AI in healthcare. A mixed-method study with 131 medical students from Singapore and China assessed the effects of varying AI methods on trust, usability, and decision-making. Results show that XAI and UQ enhance AI usability but highlight the need for clinically relevant explanations and contextualised uncertainty reasoning to optimise AI adoption in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719791
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification on Medical Students’ Perspectives of Decision-Making AI: A Cancer Screening Case Study

Xiaoyin Bai, Chang Cai, Li Rong Wang, Joanne Ngeow et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

The Effect of Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification on Medical Students’ Perspectives of Decision-Making AI: A Cancer Screening Case Study

Xiaoyin Bai, Chang Cai, Li Rong Wang, Joanne Ngeow, Xiuyi Fan, Sing Yee Toh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential to enhance healthcare decision-making but is limited by its 'black box' nature. Explainable AI (XAI) and Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) address these challenges by improving interpretability and reliability. Despite their potential, the impact of XAI and UQ on medical students’ perception of AI in healthcare remains unclear. This study explores the impact of XAI and UQ on medical students’ perceptions of AI in healthcare. A mixed-method study with 131 medical students from Singapore and China assessed the effects of varying AI methods on trust, usability, and decision-making. Results show that XAI and UQ enhance AI usability but highlight the need for clinically relevant explanations and contextualised uncertainty reasoning to optimise AI adoption in healthcare.

Nanyang Technological University (SG), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.