“The Safest Woman Alive”

We tell a story of a woman getting ready to go for a walk, using a plethora of personal safety technologies designed and reported on by HCI researchers to ensure her own safety against public gendered violence (GV). To reflect on this approach, we elicit the Four Domains of Power, highlighting HCI's over-engagement with interpersonal safety technologies when seeking to intervene in GV. In later parts of the paper, we discuss two main contributions for HCI: (1) The Complexities of Designing for GV as an Interpersonal Problem and (2) Complexities of Designing for Normative Understandings of GV to highlight the potential harm in employing interpersonal technological solutions to socio-political issues. Coming back to the four domains of power, we ultimately argue that HCI-researchers and designers can use the framework to analyze their technological interventions to address GV in more nuanced ways as to not re-produce shortsighted, solutionist, or victim-blaming technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3716240
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Safest Woman Alive”

Angelika Strohmayer, Linnea Öhlund
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

“The Safest Woman Alive”

Angelika Strohmayer, Linnea Öhlund
article en

Abstract

We tell a story of a woman getting ready to go for a walk, using a plethora of personal safety technologies designed and reported on by HCI researchers to ensure her own safety against public gendered violence (GV). To reflect on this approach, we elicit the Four Domains of Power, highlighting HCI's over-engagement with interpersonal safety technologies when seeking to intervene in GV. In later parts of the paper, we discuss two main contributions for HCI: (1) The Complexities of Designing for GV as an Interpersonal Problem and (2) Complexities of Designing for Normative Understandings of GV to highlight the potential harm in employing interpersonal technological solutions to socio-political issues. Coming back to the four domains of power, we ultimately argue that HCI-researchers and designers can use the framework to analyze their technological interventions to address GV in more nuanced ways as to not re-produce shortsighted, solutionist, or victim-blaming technologies.

Northumbria University (GB), Umeå University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“The Safest Woman Alive” — Angelika Strohmayer, Linnea Öhlund · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS