Exploring the Impact of Haptic Feedback Locations and Mid-air Haptic Technology on Driver's Takeover Performance in Automated Vehicles

Automated vehicles enable drivers to engage in non-driving-related tasks, shifting their roles and introducing challenges for effective human-machine interfaces in managing takeover requests. This study examines the impact of haptic feedback locations (i.e., hand and face) and technologies (i.e., vibrotactile and ultrasonic mid-air haptic) on the driver's takeover performance. In the experiment with 32 participants, results showed that feedback on the face led to significantly faster simple reaction times than on the hand. Additionally, vibrotactile feedback resulted in quicker takeover reaction time and lane change time compared to mid-air haptic technology. These findings highlight the importance of feedback location and technology in safety-critical scenarios and offer insights for designing more intuitive and effective takeover request mechanisms to improve driving safety in future automated vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719994
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Impact of Haptic Feedback Locations and Mid-air Haptic Technology on Driver's Takeover Performance in Automated Vehicles

Linzhen Zhu, Xu Song Sun, Ruiheng Lan, Bingjian Liu et al.
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Exploring the Impact of Haptic Feedback Locations and Mid-air Haptic Technology on Driver's Takeover Performance in Automated Vehicles

Linzhen Zhu, Xu Song Sun, Ruiheng Lan, Bingjian Liu, Qingfeng Wang
article en

Abstract

Automated vehicles enable drivers to engage in non-driving-related tasks, shifting their roles and introducing challenges for effective human-machine interfaces in managing takeover requests. This study examines the impact of haptic feedback locations (i.e., hand and face) and technologies (i.e., vibrotactile and ultrasonic mid-air haptic) on the driver's takeover performance. In the experiment with 32 participants, results showed that feedback on the face led to significantly faster simple reaction times than on the hand. Additionally, vibrotactile feedback resulted in quicker takeover reaction time and lane change time compared to mid-air haptic technology. These findings highlight the importance of feedback location and technology in safety-critical scenarios and offer insights for designing more intuitive and effective takeover request mechanisms to improve driving safety in future automated vehicles.

University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.