I Was Never in the AI.R.A: an Experimental Study on the Use of Manipulated Audio for the Censorship of Political Dissidents

During the conflict in Northern Ireland known as “the Troubles”, audio recordings of 10 controversial political groups were banned by the British government from being broadcast. Interestingly, video recordings of these people were instead overdubbed by paid actors, implying that the political figures’ original voices were somehow more convincing, legitimate or sexy than the actors. This study uses AI-generated audio to examine whether this censorship method affects opinions of political dissidents. We carried out a between-subjects experimental study (n = 636), where we compared three different types of AI-generated vocal manipulations with unedited footage of two well-known Northern Irish politicians. We found a significant negative effect of voice manipulation on perceived charisma, legitimization and credibility. Participants also voiced strong disapproval and concern at the idea of using AI to revoice historical footage. We discuss implications of AI assisted audio and video translation of politically sensitive media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3716238
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I Was Never in the AI.R.A: an Experimental Study on the Use of Manipulated Audio for the Censorship of Political Dissidents

Gillian Murphy, John G. Twomey, Cian O’Mahony, Conor Linehan et al.
Media Studies and Communication
article

I Was Never in the AI.R.A: an Experimental Study on the Use of Manipulated Audio for the Censorship of Political Dissidents

Gillian Murphy, John G. Twomey, Cian O’Mahony, Conor Linehan, Didier Ching
article en

Abstract

During the conflict in Northern Ireland known as “the Troubles”, audio recordings of 10 controversial political groups were banned by the British government from being broadcast. Interestingly, video recordings of these people were instead overdubbed by paid actors, implying that the political figures’ original voices were somehow more convincing, legitimate or sexy than the actors. This study uses AI-generated audio to examine whether this censorship method affects opinions of political dissidents. We carried out a between-subjects experimental study (n = 636), where we compared three different types of AI-generated vocal manipulations with unedited footage of two well-known Northern Irish politicians. We found a significant negative effect of voice manipulation on perceived charisma, legitimization and credibility. Participants also voiced strong disapproval and concern at the idea of using AI to revoice historical footage. We discuss implications of AI assisted audio and video translation of politically sensitive media.

Science Foundation Ireland (IE), University College Cork (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

I Was Never in the AI.R.A: an Experimental Study on the Use of Manipulated Audio for the Censorship of Political Dissidents — Gillian Murphy, John G. Twomey, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS