PATIENT TESTIMONIALS—A NEW INTERACTIVE FORMAT FOR DIALOG BETWEEN SHOCK MEMBERS AND PATIENTS

Shock® publishes over 200 scientific papers each year related to the field of shock, including trauma and sepsis. While these excellent papers report objective data about these conditions, they do not provide clinical stories that humanize the disorders or provide the surviving patients’ perspective. This Commentary presents two patient stories that illustrate the relevance of patient perception in the context of research published in Shock®. The intent is to link compelling, memorable stories that highlight how recent scientific literature addresses clinical issues. Such an additional perspective may be used by the Shock readers to communicate more effectively with non-medical policy makers and the lay public to effectively justify funding for shock research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shock
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000002607
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATIENT TESTIMONIALS—A NEW INTERACTIVE FORMAT FOR DIALOG BETWEEN SHOCK MEMBERS AND PATIENTS

Daniel G. Remick, Antoine Herpain, Andreas Markl-Le Levé, Ingrid Haller et al.
Shock
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

PATIENT TESTIMONIALS—A NEW INTERACTIVE FORMAT FOR DIALOG BETWEEN SHOCK MEMBERS AND PATIENTS

Daniel G. Remick, Antoine Herpain, Andreas Markl-Le Levé, Ingrid Haller, D Friès, Herbert Schöchl, Marcin F. Osuchowski, Paul Foell, Dennis Kredler
article en

Abstract

Shock® publishes over 200 scientific papers each year related to the field of shock, including trauma and sepsis. While these excellent papers report objective data about these conditions, they do not provide clinical stories that humanize the disorders or provide the surviving patients’ perspective. This Commentary presents two patient stories that illustrate the relevance of patient perception in the context of research published in Shock®. The intent is to link compelling, memorable stories that highlight how recent scientific literature addresses clinical issues. Such an additional perspective may be used by the Shock readers to communicate more effectively with non-medical policy makers and the lay public to effectively justify funding for shock research.

ShockVol. 64(2)
Boston University (US), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance (US), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA (AT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PATIENT TESTIMONIALS—A NEW INTERACTIVE FORMAT FOR DIALOG BETWEEN SHOCK MEMBERS AND PATIENTS — Daniel G. Remick, Antoine Herpain, et al. · Shock (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS