On factors that influence deep learning-based dose prediction of head and neck tumors

<i>Objective.</i>This study investigates key factors influencing deep learning-based dose prediction models for head and neck cancer radiation therapy. The goal is to evaluate model accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency, and to identify key components necessary for optimal performance.<i>Approach.</i>We systematically analyze the impact of input and dose grid resolution, input type, loss function, model architecture, and noise on model performance. Two datasets are used: a public dataset (OpenKBP) and an in-house clinical dataset. Model performance is primarily evaluated using two metrics: dose score and dose-volume histogram (DVH) score.<i>Main results.</i>High-resolution inputs improve prediction accuracy (dose score and DVH score) by 8.6%-13.5% compared to low resolution. Using a combination of CT, planning target volumes, and organs-at-risk as input significantly enhances accuracy, with improvements of 57.4%-86.8% over using CT alone. Integrating mean absolute error (MAE) loss with value-based and criteria-based DVH loss functions further boosts DVH score by 7.2%-7.5% compared to MAE loss alone. In the robustness analysis, most models show minimal degradation under Poisson noise (0-0.3 Gy) but are more susceptible to adversarial noise (0.2-7.8 Gy). Notably, certain models, such as SwinUNETR, demonstrate superior robustness against adversarial perturbations.<i>Significance.</i>These findings highlight the importance of optimizing deep learning models and provide valuable guidance for achieving more accurate and reliable radiotherapy dose prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adcfeb
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On factors that influence deep learning-based dose prediction of head and neck tumors

Marius Staring, Frank J. W. M. Dankers, Chinmay Rao, Prerak Mody et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

On factors that influence deep learning-based dose prediction of head and neck tumors

Marius Staring, Frank J. W. M. Dankers, Chinmay Rao, Prerak Mody, Ruochen Gao
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>This study investigates key factors influencing deep learning-based dose prediction models for head and neck cancer radiation therapy. The goal is to evaluate model accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency, and to identify key components necessary for optimal performance.<i>Approach.</i>We systematically analyze the impact of input and dose grid resolution, input type, loss function, model architecture, and noise on model performance. Two datasets are used: a public dataset (OpenKBP) and an in-house clinical dataset. Model performance is primarily evaluated using two metrics: dose score and dose-volume histogram (DVH) score.<i>Main results.</i>High-resolution inputs improve prediction accuracy (dose score and DVH score) by 8.6%-13.5% compared to low resolution. Using a combination of CT, planning target volumes, and organs-at-risk as input significantly enhances accuracy, with improvements of 57.4%-86.8% over using CT alone. Integrating mean absolute error (MAE) loss with value-based and criteria-based DVH loss functions further boosts DVH score by 7.2%-7.5% compared to MAE loss alone. In the robustness analysis, most models show minimal degradation under Poisson noise (0-0.3 Gy) but are more susceptible to adversarial noise (0.2-7.8 Gy). Notably, certain models, such as SwinUNETR, demonstrate superior robustness against adversarial perturbations.<i>Significance.</i>These findings highlight the importance of optimizing deep learning models and provide valuable guidance for achieving more accurate and reliable radiotherapy dose prediction.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(11)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.