Exploring the effects of urban rail on the survival of nearby businesses

This study investigates the spatiotemporal impacts of urban rail on business survival. Urban rail projects can increase accessibility and foot traffic, benefiting nearby businesses, but may also lead to higher rents and commercial gentrification, potentially displacing small or local businesses. However, little is known about how transit investments affect business survival over time. To address this gap, we employ a quasi-experimental design and estimate Extended Cox Hazards models using historical business microdata from Data Axle, covering a 21-year period from 1998 to 2019. Our analysis compares businesses located within 0.5 miles of light rail stations with those in a carefully selected control area, while also examining heterogeneous impacts by distance to stations and by TOD district characteristics. Our empirical application focuses on the LYNX Blue Line in Charlotte, NC. Our findings indicate that the effects of light rail on business survival are sector-specific. Specialty retailers (NAICS code 45) located between 0.125 and 0.25 miles from a station experience a 58% reduction in closure risk five to ten years after the beginning of light rail operation. Accommodation and food services (NAICS code 72) located between 0.25 and 0.5 miles from stations experience decreases of 66% in the probability of closure during the same time period. Moreover, service establishments and specialty retailers operating in TOD zones exhibit reductions in closure risk of approximately 50% compared to their counterparts in the control group. Our results demonstrate that overall, proximity to transit and TOD environments that encourage pedestrian traffic through parking restrictions and higher development density do not negatively impact retail and service establishments and in some cases significantly support the longevity of businesses. However, more research is needed to improve our understanding of transit’s impacts on nearby businesses and to design relevant and effective policies. • Extended Cox Hazards models on survival of retail and service businesses near transit. • Analysis of historical business microdata over a 21-year period. • Quasi-experimental design isolates transit impact on firm survival. • TOD districts and distance from stations shape the effects on business survival. • Higher probability of survival for specialty retailers and service establishments close to transit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.04.011
Primary Topic
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the effects of urban rail on the survival of nearby businesses

Eleni Bardaka, Chang Liu
Transport Policy
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
article

Exploring the effects of urban rail on the survival of nearby businesses

Eleni Bardaka, Chang Liu
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the spatiotemporal impacts of urban rail on business survival. Urban rail projects can increase accessibility and foot traffic, benefiting nearby businesses, but may also lead to higher rents and commercial gentrification, potentially displacing small or local businesses. However, little is known about how transit investments affect business survival over time. To address this gap, we employ a quasi-experimental design and estimate Extended Cox Hazards models using historical business microdata from Data Axle, covering a 21-year period from 1998 to 2019. Our analysis compares businesses located within 0.5 miles of light rail stations with those in a carefully selected control area, while also examining heterogeneous impacts by distance to stations and by TOD district characteristics. Our empirical application focuses on the LYNX Blue Line in Charlotte, NC. Our findings indicate that the effects of light rail on business survival are sector-specific. Specialty retailers (NAICS code 45) located between 0.125 and 0.25 miles from a station experience a 58% reduction in closure risk five to ten years after the beginning of light rail operation. Accommodation and food services (NAICS code 72) located between 0.25 and 0.5 miles from stations experience decreases of 66% in the probability of closure during the same time period. Moreover, service establishments and specialty retailers operating in TOD zones exhibit reductions in closure risk of approximately 50% compared to their counterparts in the control group. Our results demonstrate that overall, proximity to transit and TOD environments that encourage pedestrian traffic through parking restrictions and higher development density do not negatively impact retail and service establishments and in some cases significantly support the longevity of businesses. However, more research is needed to improve our understanding of transit’s impacts on nearby businesses and to design relevant and effective policies. • Extended Cox Hazards models on survival of retail and service businesses near transit. • Analysis of historical business microdata over a 21-year period. • Quasi-experimental design isolates transit impact on firm survival. • TOD districts and distance from stations shape the effects on business survival. • Higher probability of survival for specialty retailers and service establishments close to transit.

Transport PolicyVol. 169
North Carolina State University (US)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.