The Prevalence of Reported Gavage Incidents in Repeated Dose Toxicity Studies Involving Rats Conducted Between 2004–2023

In animal-based toxicology studies, oral gavage is the predominant technique for administering compounds directly into the stomach. Recognised as a stressful procedure for animals, gavage is associated with accidents and 'gavage-related reflux' (GRR), which may lead to respiratory distress and/or death. This paper estimates the prevalence of incidents (deaths and/or non-fatal clinical signs) attributed to the gavage procedure in a representative sample of repeated dose toxicity test reports from the last 20 years, sourced from the ECHA CHEM database of REACH-registered chemicals. In 21% of the 300 reviewed studies, at least one death or clinical sign in rats was attributed to the gavage procedure in the study report. An additional 16% of these studies reported clinical signs associated with GRR in the animals, with no other adverse effects, but without attribution to the gavage procedure. Among those studies with incidents attributed to the gavage procedure, incidents were three times more common in 90-day studies than they were in 28-day studies. Incidents were also more likely to have occurred with the test substance rather than with the control, with highly viscous substances, and in more recently conducted studies. There was no association between the number of studies with a gavage-attributed incident and the strain, size or age of the rats, the dose volume or the testing of irritant substances. The current study suggests that incidents attributed to gavage are more prevalent than previously thought, and that a review of the gavage procedure is urgently needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929251334721
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevalence of Reported Gavage Incidents in Repeated Dose Toxicity Studies Involving Rats Conducted Between 2004–2023

Emma Grange, Laura Rego Alvarez, Katy Taylor
2 citations
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Animal testing and alternatives
4.71
article

The Prevalence of Reported Gavage Incidents in Repeated Dose Toxicity Studies Involving Rats Conducted Between 2004–2023

Emma Grange, Laura Rego Alvarez, Katy Taylor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In animal-based toxicology studies, oral gavage is the predominant technique for administering compounds directly into the stomach. Recognised as a stressful procedure for animals, gavage is associated with accidents and 'gavage-related reflux' (GRR), which may lead to respiratory distress and/or death. This paper estimates the prevalence of incidents (deaths and/or non-fatal clinical signs) attributed to the gavage procedure in a representative sample of repeated dose toxicity test reports from the last 20 years, sourced from the ECHA CHEM database of REACH-registered chemicals. In 21% of the 300 reviewed studies, at least one death or clinical sign in rats was attributed to the gavage procedure in the study report. An additional 16% of these studies reported clinical signs associated with GRR in the animals, with no other adverse effects, but without attribution to the gavage procedure. Among those studies with incidents attributed to the gavage procedure, incidents were three times more common in 90-day studies than they were in 28-day studies. Incidents were also more likely to have occurred with the test substance rather than with the control, with highly viscous substances, and in more recently conducted studies. There was no association between the number of studies with a gavage-attributed incident and the strain, size or age of the rats, the dose volume or the testing of irritant substances. The current study suggests that incidents attributed to gavage are more prevalent than previously thought, and that a review of the gavage procedure is urgently needed.

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsVol. 53(3)
National Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal testing and alternatives
4.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.