Navigating relationships and tensions: how professionals who treat substance use disorders view their role in preventing child abuse and neglect

The potential negative effects of caregivers’ substance use disorders (SUDs) on their parenting are well documented, but the intervention of healthcare professionals treating these disorders in cases of child abuse and neglect (CAN) is constrained by ethical dilemmas and mistrust of child welfare services (CWS). Many studies have explored the synergies between SUD treatments and developing parenting skills, but few studies have explored these professionals' diverse perceptions and experiences – ranging from doubts and challenges to constructive ideas and practices that address parenting and treatment needs. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences regarding the tensions, obstacles, opportunities and good practices related to detecting potential CAN and promoting changes in their patients’ parenting. Twenty healthcare professionals from various services within the Catalan Drug Abuse Care Centre Network (Spain) participated in the study. Two focus groups discussed the issues and good practices surrounding the detection and intervention in possible cases of CAN. The transcriptions underwent reflexive thematic analysis building 7 themes. The participants cited reasons for not intervening in their patients' parenting. They discussed the importance and fragility of the therapeutic bond, structural deficiencies in their services, and the challenges of working with CWS. They also described conditions and practices that help improve caregivers’ parenting such as restoring damaged bonds. The full range of healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions regarding their patients’ parenting and child welfare must be contemplated in programs aimed at integrating family support with the treatment of SUDs. • Providers can face ethical dilemmas when intervening with potential child abuse and neglect of clients' children. • Professionals' therapeutic bond with caregivers may aid and limit child protection. • Child protection concerns may be seen as competing with client substance use treatment needs. • Child welfare services perceived more as an overseeing authority than a partner. • Professionals who treat substance use disorders need training about child protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100164
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating relationships and tensions: how professionals who treat substance use disorders view their role in preventing child abuse and neglect

Paulo Padilla Petry, Nuria Fuentes‐Peláez, Anna Fantova-Romero
Child Protection and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Navigating relationships and tensions: how professionals who treat substance use disorders view their role in preventing child abuse and neglect

Paulo Padilla Petry, Nuria Fuentes‐Peláez, Anna Fantova-Romero
article en

Abstract

The potential negative effects of caregivers’ substance use disorders (SUDs) on their parenting are well documented, but the intervention of healthcare professionals treating these disorders in cases of child abuse and neglect (CAN) is constrained by ethical dilemmas and mistrust of child welfare services (CWS). Many studies have explored the synergies between SUD treatments and developing parenting skills, but few studies have explored these professionals' diverse perceptions and experiences – ranging from doubts and challenges to constructive ideas and practices that address parenting and treatment needs. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences regarding the tensions, obstacles, opportunities and good practices related to detecting potential CAN and promoting changes in their patients’ parenting. Twenty healthcare professionals from various services within the Catalan Drug Abuse Care Centre Network (Spain) participated in the study. Two focus groups discussed the issues and good practices surrounding the detection and intervention in possible cases of CAN. The transcriptions underwent reflexive thematic analysis building 7 themes. The participants cited reasons for not intervening in their patients' parenting. They discussed the importance and fragility of the therapeutic bond, structural deficiencies in their services, and the challenges of working with CWS. They also described conditions and practices that help improve caregivers’ parenting such as restoring damaged bonds. The full range of healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions regarding their patients’ parenting and child welfare must be contemplated in programs aimed at integrating family support with the treatment of SUDs. • Providers can face ethical dilemmas when intervening with potential child abuse and neglect of clients' children. • Professionals' therapeutic bond with caregivers may aid and limit child protection. • Child protection concerns may be seen as competing with client substance use treatment needs. • Child welfare services perceived more as an overseeing authority than a partner. • Professionals who treat substance use disorders need training about child protection.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 5
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.