ADVANCING MEDICARE FRAUD DETECTION VIA MACHINE LEARNING AND SMOTE-ENN FOR IMBALANCED DATA

The subject of healthcare fraud detection is always changing and has many obstacles to overcome, especially when dealing with skewed data. Prior research mostly concentrated on conventional machine learning (ML) methods, which often had trouble handling unbalanced data. This issue comes up in a number of ways. Random Oversampling (ROS) raises the danger of overfitting, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) introduces noise, and Random Undersampling (RUS) may result in the loss of important information. Furthermore, increasing assessment metrics, investigating hybrid resampling strategies, and optimising model performance are essential for reaching greater accuracy with unbalanced datasets. With an emphasis on the Medicare Part B dataset, we address the problem of unbalanced datasets in healthcare fraud detection in this study using a unique technique. The categorical feature "Provider Type" is first meticulously extracted from the dataset. This increases the variety within the minority class by enabling us to create new, synthetic instances by randomly reproducing preexisting kinds. Next, we use a hybrid resampling technique called SMOTE-ENN, which combines Edited Nearest Neighbours (ENN) with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). By creating artificial samples and eliminating noisy data, this technique seeks to balance the dataset and increase the models' accuracy. We classify the examples using six machine learning (ML) models. We use standard measures like as accuracy, F1 score, recall, precision, and the AUC-ROC curve to assess performance. We emphasise how important the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) is for evaluating performance in situations with unbalanced datasets. With a score of 0.99 on all measures, the studies demonstrate that Decision Trees (DT) performed better than any classifier.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62643/ijerst.2025.v21.i2.pp408-419
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADVANCING MEDICARE FRAUD DETECTION VIA MACHINE LEARNING AND SMOTE-ENN FOR IMBALANCED DATA

K.N. Swamy, Shaik Abdullah
International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

ADVANCING MEDICARE FRAUD DETECTION VIA MACHINE LEARNING AND SMOTE-ENN FOR IMBALANCED DATA

K.N. Swamy, Shaik Abdullah
article en

Abstract

The subject of healthcare fraud detection is always changing and has many obstacles to overcome, especially when dealing with skewed data. Prior research mostly concentrated on conventional machine learning (ML) methods, which often had trouble handling unbalanced data. This issue comes up in a number of ways. Random Oversampling (ROS) raises the danger of overfitting, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) introduces noise, and Random Undersampling (RUS) may result in the loss of important information. Furthermore, increasing assessment metrics, investigating hybrid resampling strategies, and optimising model performance are essential for reaching greater accuracy with unbalanced datasets. With an emphasis on the Medicare Part B dataset, we address the problem of unbalanced datasets in healthcare fraud detection in this study using a unique technique. The categorical feature "Provider Type" is first meticulously extracted from the dataset. This increases the variety within the minority class by enabling us to create new, synthetic instances by randomly reproducing preexisting kinds. Next, we use a hybrid resampling technique called SMOTE-ENN, which combines Edited Nearest Neighbours (ENN) with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). By creating artificial samples and eliminating noisy data, this technique seeks to balance the dataset and increase the models' accuracy. We classify the examples using six machine learning (ML) models. We use standard measures like as accuracy, F1 score, recall, precision, and the AUC-ROC curve to assess performance. We emphasise how important the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) is for evaluating performance in situations with unbalanced datasets. With a score of 0.99 on all measures, the studies demonstrate that Decision Trees (DT) performed better than any classifier.

International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & TechnologyVol. 21(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.