ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME STRESS MONITORING USING PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS IN HAZARDOUS WORK ENVIRONMENTS

Real-time stress detection is useful for maximising work performance and lowering stress during training for dangerous tasks. In order to categorise the stress levels of unseen data, stress detection systems use physiological signals to train a machine-learning model. Unfortunately, post-hoc stress detection and real-time monitoring are hampered by individual variability and the time-series structure of physiological data, which restricts the efficacy of generalised models. A customised stress detection method that chooses a customised subset of characteristics for model training was assessed in this research. For deployment in real time, the system was assessed after the fact. Additionally, a benchmark, optimum probability classifier (Approximate Bayes; ABayes) was utilised to evaluate the inaccuracy caused by indirect approximations in standard classifiers. Either a straightforward laboratory-based activity (N-back, n = 14) or a sophisticated virtual reality task (responding to spacecraft emergency fires, n = 27) with three stressor levels (low, medium, and high) were performed by healthy individuals. Assessments were made of breathing, heart rate, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity. Window sizes and customised features were contrasted. The classification performance of random forests, decision trees, support vector machines, and ABayes was compared. The findings show that three stress levels may be more accurately classified by a customised model with time series intervals than by a generalised model. However, holdout performance and cross-validation differed between ABayes and classical classifiers, indicating inaccuracy from indirect approximations. Although the chosen characteristics varied depending on the activities and window size, blood pressure was determined to be the most noticeable. Personalised models have the benefit of being able to take individual differences into account, and this feature is probably going to become more prevalent in detection systems of the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62643/ijerst.2025.v21.i2.pp632-641
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME STRESS MONITORING USING PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS IN HAZARDOUS WORK ENVIRONMENTS

B. Jagadeesh, Dr.M.Veeresha
International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME STRESS MONITORING USING PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS IN HAZARDOUS WORK ENVIRONMENTS

B. Jagadeesh, Dr.M.Veeresha
article en

Abstract

Real-time stress detection is useful for maximising work performance and lowering stress during training for dangerous tasks. In order to categorise the stress levels of unseen data, stress detection systems use physiological signals to train a machine-learning model. Unfortunately, post-hoc stress detection and real-time monitoring are hampered by individual variability and the time-series structure of physiological data, which restricts the efficacy of generalised models. A customised stress detection method that chooses a customised subset of characteristics for model training was assessed in this research. For deployment in real time, the system was assessed after the fact. Additionally, a benchmark, optimum probability classifier (Approximate Bayes; ABayes) was utilised to evaluate the inaccuracy caused by indirect approximations in standard classifiers. Either a straightforward laboratory-based activity (N-back, n = 14) or a sophisticated virtual reality task (responding to spacecraft emergency fires, n = 27) with three stressor levels (low, medium, and high) were performed by healthy individuals. Assessments were made of breathing, heart rate, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity. Window sizes and customised features were contrasted. The classification performance of random forests, decision trees, support vector machines, and ABayes was compared. The findings show that three stress levels may be more accurately classified by a customised model with time series intervals than by a generalised model. However, holdout performance and cross-validation differed between ABayes and classical classifiers, indicating inaccuracy from indirect approximations. Although the chosen characteristics varied depending on the activities and window size, blood pressure was determined to be the most noticeable. Personalised models have the benefit of being able to take individual differences into account, and this feature is probably going to become more prevalent in detection systems of the future.

International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & TechnologyVol. 21(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.