Parameter Estimation Precision with Geocentric Gravitational Wave Interferometers: Monochromatic Signals

We present a Fisher information matrix study of the parameter estimation precision achievable by a class of future space-based, “mid-band”, gravitational wave interferometers observing monochromatic signals. The mid-band is the frequency region between that accessible by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and ground-based interferometers. We analyze monochromatic signals observed by the TianQin mission, gLISA (a LISA-like interferometer in a geosynchronous orbit) and a descoped gLISA mission, gLISAd, characterized by an acceleration noise level that is three orders of magnitude worse than that of gLISA. We find that all three missions achieve their best angular source reconstruction precision in the higher part of their accessible frequency band, with an error box better than 10−10 sr in the frequency band [10−1,10] Hz when observing a monochromatic gravitational wave signal of amplitude h0=10−21 that is incoming from a given direction. In terms of their reconstructed frequencies and amplitudes, TianQin achieves its best precision values in both quantities in the frequency band [10−2,4×10−1] Hz, with a frequency precision σfgw=2×10−11 Hz and an amplitude precision σh0=2×10−24. gLISA matches these precisions in a frequency band slightly higher than that of TianQin, [3×10−2,1] Hz, as a consequence of its smaller arm length. gLISAd, on the other hand, matches the performance of gLISA only over the narrower frequency region, [7×10−1,1] Hz, as a consequence of its higher acceleration noise at lower frequencies. The angular, frequency, and amplitude precisions as functions of the source sky location are then derived by assuming an average signal-to-noise ratio of 10 at a selected number of gravitational wave frequencies covering the operational bandwidth of TianQin and gLISA. Similar precision functions are then derived for gLISAd by using the amplitudes resulting in the gLISA average SNR being equal to 10 at the selected frequencies. We find that, for any given source location, all three missions display a marked precision improvement in the three reconstructed parameters at higher gravitational wave frequencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universe
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11040122
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parameter Estimation Precision with Geocentric Gravitational Wave Interferometers: Monochromatic Signals

Massimo Tinto, M. F. Sousa, T. A. Ferreira
Universe
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

Parameter Estimation Precision with Geocentric Gravitational Wave Interferometers: Monochromatic Signals

Massimo Tinto, M. F. Sousa, T. A. Ferreira
article en

Abstract

We present a Fisher information matrix study of the parameter estimation precision achievable by a class of future space-based, “mid-band”, gravitational wave interferometers observing monochromatic signals. The mid-band is the frequency region between that accessible by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and ground-based interferometers. We analyze monochromatic signals observed by the TianQin mission, gLISA (a LISA-like interferometer in a geosynchronous orbit) and a descoped gLISA mission, gLISAd, characterized by an acceleration noise level that is three orders of magnitude worse than that of gLISA. We find that all three missions achieve their best angular source reconstruction precision in the higher part of their accessible frequency band, with an error box better than 10−10 sr in the frequency band [10−1,10] Hz when observing a monochromatic gravitational wave signal of amplitude h0=10−21 that is incoming from a given direction. In terms of their reconstructed frequencies and amplitudes, TianQin achieves its best precision values in both quantities in the frequency band [10−2,4×10−1] Hz, with a frequency precision σfgw=2×10−11 Hz and an amplitude precision σh0=2×10−24. gLISA matches these precisions in a frequency band slightly higher than that of TianQin, [3×10−2,1] Hz, as a consequence of its smaller arm length. gLISAd, on the other hand, matches the performance of gLISA only over the narrower frequency region, [7×10−1,1] Hz, as a consequence of its higher acceleration noise at lower frequencies. The angular, frequency, and amplitude precisions as functions of the source sky location are then derived by assuming an average signal-to-noise ratio of 10 at a selected number of gravitational wave frequencies covering the operational bandwidth of TianQin and gLISA. Similar precision functions are then derived for gLISAd by using the amplitudes resulting in the gLISA average SNR being equal to 10 at the selected frequencies. We find that, for any given source location, all three missions display a marked precision improvement in the three reconstructed parameters at higher gravitational wave frequencies.

UniverseVol. 11(4)
Louisiana State University (US), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.