Research 4.0 and the Ontological Turn

Abstract Drawing on the term ‘Research 4.0’ to describe research that relies on twenty-first- century convergent technologies that are defining industry 4.0, including human sensory enhancements, this paper interrogates the ontological turn to interface spirituality and technology. Drawing on fieldwork in Zimbabwe, this paper contends that Research 4.0 enhances relational fieldwork, which is an aspect of the ontological turn, but it cautions that African ontologies should not be mistaken for relational ontologies that presuppose that humans and nonhumans are on the same ontological plane. The paper contends that with the human enhancements that come with Research 4.0 it would be possible to consider research on both human subjectivities and nonhuman umwelts , including those of animal familiars. And when humans begin to share genomes of nonhuman witches’ familiars, in chimera-hood, it becomes possible to study the visible and invisible of quantum anthropology in ways that obviate the pitfalls of the speculative turn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religion in Africa
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15700666-12340331
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research 4.0 and the Ontological Turn

Artwell Nhemachena
1 links
Journal of Religion in Africa
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Research 4.0 and the Ontological Turn

Artwell Nhemachena
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on the term ‘Research 4.0’ to describe research that relies on twenty-first- century convergent technologies that are defining industry 4.0, including human sensory enhancements, this paper interrogates the ontological turn to interface spirituality and technology. Drawing on fieldwork in Zimbabwe, this paper contends that Research 4.0 enhances relational fieldwork, which is an aspect of the ontological turn, but it cautions that African ontologies should not be mistaken for relational ontologies that presuppose that humans and nonhumans are on the same ontological plane. The paper contends that with the human enhancements that come with Research 4.0 it would be possible to consider research on both human subjectivities and nonhuman umwelts , including those of animal familiars. And when humans begin to share genomes of nonhuman witches’ familiars, in chimera-hood, it becomes possible to study the visible and invisible of quantum anthropology in ways that obviate the pitfalls of the speculative turn.

Journal of Religion in AfricaVol. 56(1)
University of South Africa (ZA), University of Namibia (NA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.