Pindaric Intertextuality and Tragic Irony in Sophocles’ Trachiniae

Abstract The purpose of this article is to provide further insight into various interpretative issues raised by the first stasimon of Sophocles’ Trachiniae ( Tr . 497-530). First, I argue that the influence of epinician lyric on Sophocles’ stasimon is not only restricted to similarities and parallels in imagery and style, but can be further supported by specific reminiscences of Pindaric odes ( Isthmian 4, Nemean 1): this entails a deeper reflection upon the negotiations and differentiations between epinician and tragic poetry, and the role of Pindaric intertextuality for the achievement of tragic irony. Subsequently, I show how the enigmatic conclusion of the stasimon ( Tr . 526-530) can be relevant for a better understanding of the function and meaning of the stasimon within the development of the entire plot, and a further appreciation of Sophocles’ original approach to the mythical tradition and his ‘tragicization’ of Heracles’ and Deianeira’s figures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mnemosyne
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10271
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pindaric Intertextuality and Tragic Irony in Sophocles’ Trachiniae

Alessio Ranno
2 citations
Mnemosyne
Classical Antiquity Studies
22.69
article

Pindaric Intertextuality and Tragic Irony in Sophocles’ Trachiniae

Alessio Ranno
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this article is to provide further insight into various interpretative issues raised by the first stasimon of Sophocles’ Trachiniae ( Tr . 497-530). First, I argue that the influence of epinician lyric on Sophocles’ stasimon is not only restricted to similarities and parallels in imagery and style, but can be further supported by specific reminiscences of Pindaric odes ( Isthmian 4, Nemean 1): this entails a deeper reflection upon the negotiations and differentiations between epinician and tragic poetry, and the role of Pindaric intertextuality for the achievement of tragic irony. Subsequently, I show how the enigmatic conclusion of the stasimon ( Tr . 526-530) can be relevant for a better understanding of the function and meaning of the stasimon within the development of the entire plot, and a further appreciation of Sophocles’ original approach to the mythical tradition and his ‘tragicization’ of Heracles’ and Deianeira’s figures.

MnemosyneVol. 78(3)
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Classical Antiquity Studies
22.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.