Relevance and flexibility are key: exploring healthcare managers’ views and experiences of a de-adoption programme in the English National Health Service

This study is, to our knowledge, the first investigation of how devolved healthcare policymakers respond to national de-adoption recommendations. Our study highlights that local implementation of national de-adoption policies is not necessarily straightforward, by virtue of the fact that de-adoption concerns entrenched interventions for which devolved policies may already exist. It is therefore critical that national de-adoption initiatives provide guidance around how devolved policymakers should reconcile national recommendations with local policies and processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12700-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relevance and flexibility are key: exploring healthcare managers’ views and experiences of a de-adoption programme in the English National Health Service

M. J. Bell, Angus McNair, Tim Jones, Amanda Owen‐Smith et al.
1 citations
BMC Health Services Research
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.82
article

Relevance and flexibility are key: exploring healthcare managers’ views and experiences of a de-adoption programme in the English National Health Service

M. J. Bell, Angus McNair, Tim Jones, Amanda Owen‐Smith, Carmel Conefrey, Victoria Tucker, Iestyn Williams, Christopher R Burton, Josie Morley, Ellen Rule, Jenny Donovan, Nicola Farrar, Jane M. Blazeby, Andy Gibson, Joel Glynn, William Hollingworth, Leila Rooshenas, Gail Thornton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study is, to our knowledge, the first investigation of how devolved healthcare policymakers respond to national de-adoption recommendations. Our study highlights that local implementation of national de-adoption policies is not necessarily straightforward, by virtue of the fact that de-adoption concerns entrenched interventions for which devolved policies may already exist. It is therefore critical that national de-adoption initiatives provide guidance around how devolved policymakers should reconcile national recommendations with local policies and processes.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
University of Gloucestershire (GB), Canterbury Christ Church University (GB), North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Southmead Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group (GB), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Health and Social Care Delivery Research, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.