Naïve Realism and (Some) High‐Level Illusions

ABSTRACT So‐called high‐levelists about perceptual experience claim that we can perceive not only low‐level properties such as colour and shape but also high‐level properties such as natural kind properties. Although various proponents of opposing theories of perception agree on this high‐levelist view, it is seldom asked which theories of perception have resources to account for high‐level perception. In this paper, I raise this question for naïve realism and argue that if perceptual experiences present “high‐level” properties, certain high‐level illusions pose a problem for naïve realism. Specifically, I maintain that the naïve realist's strategies for addressing illusions of low‐level properties are unpromising when it comes to addressing illusions of high‐level properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoria
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.70020
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Naïve Realism and (Some) High‐Level Illusions

Yavuz Recep Başoğlu
Theoria
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Naïve Realism and (Some) High‐Level Illusions

Yavuz Recep Başoğlu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT So‐called high‐levelists about perceptual experience claim that we can perceive not only low‐level properties such as colour and shape but also high‐level properties such as natural kind properties. Although various proponents of opposing theories of perception agree on this high‐levelist view, it is seldom asked which theories of perception have resources to account for high‐level perception. In this paper, I raise this question for naïve realism and argue that if perceptual experiences present “high‐level” properties, certain high‐level illusions pose a problem for naïve realism. Specifically, I maintain that the naïve realist's strategies for addressing illusions of low‐level properties are unpromising when it comes to addressing illusions of high‐level properties.

TheoriaVol. 91(4)
Central European University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.