Analisis Debit Dengan Metode F.J. Mock Dan NRECA Serta Perbandingannya Terhadap Debit Pos Duga Air

The Makawa river basin located in the Rongkong watershed has an increase in surface flow which affects the discharge flow which can cause flooding. Therefore, discharge data is needed to manage existing water resources. This study aims to analyze the water discharge using the F.J. Mock and NRECA methods, which are then compared to the water estimation post discharge. The results of this study showed that the F.J. Mock method has a relative error of 48% and a correlation coefficient of 0,690 with a strong interpretation, while NRECA showed a relative error of 50% and a correlation coefficient of 0,669 with a strong interpretation. Therefore, it is concluded that the F.J. Mock method is more appropriate than the NRECA method with lower relative error results, and a higher correlation coefficient than NRECA. The result of the simulation discharge between F.J. Mock, NRACA and water estimation post discharge are quite far apart.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Karajata Engineering
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31850/karajata.v5i1.3624
Primary Topic
Engineering and Technology Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Debit Dengan Metode F.J. Mock Dan NRECA Serta Perbandingannya Terhadap Debit Pos Duga Air

M. Agussalim, Indriyanti Azis, Sukmasari Antaria, K Riswal et al.
Jurnal Karajata Engineering
Engineering and Technology Innovations
article

Analisis Debit Dengan Metode F.J. Mock Dan NRECA Serta Perbandingannya Terhadap Debit Pos Duga Air

M. Agussalim, Indriyanti Azis, Sukmasari Antaria, K Riswal, Annisa Febrianti, Ayu Rosdiana
article en

Abstract

The Makawa river basin located in the Rongkong watershed has an increase in surface flow which affects the discharge flow which can cause flooding. Therefore, discharge data is needed to manage existing water resources. This study aims to analyze the water discharge using the F.J. Mock and NRECA methods, which are then compared to the water estimation post discharge. The results of this study showed that the F.J. Mock method has a relative error of 48% and a correlation coefficient of 0,690 with a strong interpretation, while NRECA showed a relative error of 50% and a correlation coefficient of 0,669 with a strong interpretation. Therefore, it is concluded that the F.J. Mock method is more appropriate than the NRECA method with lower relative error results, and a higher correlation coefficient than NRECA. The result of the simulation discharge between F.J. Mock, NRACA and water estimation post discharge are quite far apart.

Jurnal Karajata EngineeringVol. 5(1)
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (ID), Hasanuddin University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Engineering and Technology Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.