Information vs misinformation: impact on the public debate agenda

When a problem receives massive dimensions in society or affects the common good, then it is considered as a public problem. The value and usefulness of information to citizens sometimes comes to be degraded by misinformation in order to serve some purposes, as an influence tool. The efforts of powerful actors to push their agenda in the public discussion combined with information falseness emerges a possible problematic situation of agenda setting mixed with misinformation. In the article we discuss the case of Pizzagate as a conspiracy theory according to certain sources, which occupied the public debate, near the US presidential elections. By this article, we underline the risks of information falseness for public security and the need of state measures to limit the phenomenon.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Moldoscopie
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52388/1812-2566.2024.2(101).05
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information vs misinformation: impact on the public debate agenda

Moraru Victor, Marousis Theofilos
1 citations
Moldoscopie
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
article

Information vs misinformation: impact on the public debate agenda

Moraru Victor, Marousis Theofilos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When a problem receives massive dimensions in society or affects the common good, then it is considered as a public problem. The value and usefulness of information to citizens sometimes comes to be degraded by misinformation in order to serve some purposes, as an influence tool. The efforts of powerful actors to push their agenda in the public discussion combined with information falseness emerges a possible problematic situation of agenda setting mixed with misinformation. In the article we discuss the case of Pizzagate as a conspiracy theory according to certain sources, which occupied the public debate, near the US presidential elections. By this article, we underline the risks of information falseness for public security and the need of state measures to limit the phenomenon.

Moldoscopie(2(101))
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.