One Plus One Equals Two, or Reconsidering the Qualification of Murder and Its Associated Crime

This article addresses a key issue in the legal qualification of murders described in subparagraphs “b”, “z”, and “k” of Part 2, Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, particularly when such murders are committed in conjunction with other crimes. This matter has long been the subject of debate among legal practitioners. By analyzing the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code, rulings from the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, academic literature, and judicial practice, the author arrives at the following conclusions. Murder committed in connection with kidnapping, robbery, extortion, banditry, rape, or violent sexual acts – as outlined in the aforementioned subparagraphs – is a form of intentional homicide in which a causal and mutually dependent relationship exists between the murder and the accompanying crime. In such cases, the act of murder is driven by the commission of one of the specified crimes. Murder associated with these other offenses does not fall under the exception listed in Part 1 of Article 17 of the Criminal Code of RF, which relates to the legal concept of concurrence of crimes (i.e., committing two or more separate crimes). This is because in each of the qualifying scenarios under subparagraphs “b”, “z”, and “k” of Part 2, Article 105, the law establishes liability for a single, aggravated crime – namely, murder with a specific aggravating circumstance (i.e., its connection to one of the listed crimes) – rather than for multiple crimes. However, the article argues that when both the murder and the associated crime are committed, they should be qualified cumulatively. That is, legal qualification should involve both Part 2, Article 105 and the relevant article corresponding to the accompanying offense: Articles 126 (Kidnapping), 131 (Rape), 132 (Violent Sexual Acts), 162 (Robbery), 163 (Extortion), or 209 (Banditry) of the Criminal Code of RF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Siberian Law Review
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2025-22-1-112-12
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Plus One Equals Two, or Reconsidering the Qualification of Murder and Its Associated Crime

D. Yu. Kraev
Siberian Law Review
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

One Plus One Equals Two, or Reconsidering the Qualification of Murder and Its Associated Crime

D. Yu. Kraev
article en

Abstract

This article addresses a key issue in the legal qualification of murders described in subparagraphs “b”, “z”, and “k” of Part 2, Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, particularly when such murders are committed in conjunction with other crimes. This matter has long been the subject of debate among legal practitioners. By analyzing the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code, rulings from the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, academic literature, and judicial practice, the author arrives at the following conclusions. Murder committed in connection with kidnapping, robbery, extortion, banditry, rape, or violent sexual acts – as outlined in the aforementioned subparagraphs – is a form of intentional homicide in which a causal and mutually dependent relationship exists between the murder and the accompanying crime. In such cases, the act of murder is driven by the commission of one of the specified crimes. Murder associated with these other offenses does not fall under the exception listed in Part 1 of Article 17 of the Criminal Code of RF, which relates to the legal concept of concurrence of crimes (i.e., committing two or more separate crimes). This is because in each of the qualifying scenarios under subparagraphs “b”, “z”, and “k” of Part 2, Article 105, the law establishes liability for a single, aggravated crime – namely, murder with a specific aggravating circumstance (i.e., its connection to one of the listed crimes) – rather than for multiple crimes. However, the article argues that when both the murder and the associated crime are committed, they should be qualified cumulatively. That is, legal qualification should involve both Part 2, Article 105 and the relevant article corresponding to the accompanying offense: Articles 126 (Kidnapping), 131 (Rape), 132 (Violent Sexual Acts), 162 (Robbery), 163 (Extortion), or 209 (Banditry) of the Criminal Code of RF.

Siberian Law ReviewVol. 22(1)
Saint Petersburg Institute of Law named after Prince P. Oldenburg (RU), Kazan Law Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.