Revisiting the Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition

ABSTRACT Research on implicit social cognition explores how associations outside of conscious awareness or control can influence beliefs and behaviors, and the field has been one of the most popular areas of psychological research over the past 30 years. The relevance of implicit social cognition to policy has been previously explored in this journal. Here, we revisit this earlier discussion given that the field has made numerous—and in some cases pessimistic—advances regarding basic research questions on the construct and measures of implicit social cognition as well as the broader policy implications of such work. Specifically, we provide an updated review of available evidence concerning how implicit associations shift over time, relate to behavior, and change in response to interventions. Finally, we discuss how better understanding the strengths and limitations of research in implicit social cognition can productively inform ongoing policy and educational efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Issues and Policy Review
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.70003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition

Jordan Axt, Valentina Palacio Posada, Eliane Roy, Jeffrey To
2 citations
Social Issues and Policy Review
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
article

Revisiting the Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition

Jordan Axt, Valentina Palacio Posada, Eliane Roy, Jeffrey To
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on implicit social cognition explores how associations outside of conscious awareness or control can influence beliefs and behaviors, and the field has been one of the most popular areas of psychological research over the past 30 years. The relevance of implicit social cognition to policy has been previously explored in this journal. Here, we revisit this earlier discussion given that the field has made numerous—and in some cases pessimistic—advances regarding basic research questions on the construct and measures of implicit social cognition as well as the broader policy implications of such work. Specifically, we provide an updated review of available evidence concerning how implicit associations shift over time, relate to behavior, and change in response to interventions. Finally, we discuss how better understanding the strengths and limitations of research in implicit social cognition can productively inform ongoing policy and educational efforts.

Social Issues and Policy ReviewVol. 19(1)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.