Performance Comparison of Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine Algorithms in Spambot Classification in Emails

In the ever-growing digital era, email spam is a serious threat that affects user productivity and information security. This study aims to analyze the comparative effectiveness of Naive Bayes and SVM algorithms with radial basis function (RBF) kernels in classifying spambots in emails. The methodology used includes collecting email datasets, applying both algorithms for classification, and evaluating performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score metrics. The results showed that SVM RBF performed better than Gaussian Naive Bayes, with significant improvements in all evaluation metrics. These findings provide important insights for the development of more accurate and efficient spam detection systems, and highlight the importance of selecting appropriate algorithms in the face of complex data classification challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Basic and Applied Science
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v13i3.522
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine Algorithms in Spambot Classification in Emails

Jonson Manurung, Hondor Saragih
International Journal of Basic and Applied Science
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Performance Comparison of Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine Algorithms in Spambot Classification in Emails

Jonson Manurung, Hondor Saragih
article en

Abstract

In the ever-growing digital era, email spam is a serious threat that affects user productivity and information security. This study aims to analyze the comparative effectiveness of Naive Bayes and SVM algorithms with radial basis function (RBF) kernels in classifying spambots in emails. The methodology used includes collecting email datasets, applying both algorithms for classification, and evaluating performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score metrics. The results showed that SVM RBF performed better than Gaussian Naive Bayes, with significant improvements in all evaluation metrics. These findings provide important insights for the development of more accurate and efficient spam detection systems, and highlight the importance of selecting appropriate algorithms in the face of complex data classification challenges.

International Journal of Basic and Applied ScienceVol. 13(3)
Indonesia Defense University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Comparison of Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine Algorithms in Spambot Classification in Emails — Jonson Manurung, Hondor Saragih · International Journal of Basic and Applied Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS