SDG rubrics for higher education: framework design, indicator development, and practical applications

Abstract This paper reports on a multiyear program of international collaborative research delivered with the aim of conceptualising, validating and prototyping rubrics for evaluating and reporting university activities and outcomes relevant to the UN SDGs. The paper sets foundations by building on earlier analysis of research on university engagement with the UN SDGs, and into how the SDGs can be structured conceptually into rubrics for evaluative application. It outlines the design used to articulate the rubrics framework, before presenting results based on data from 30 internationally and institutionally diverse universities. The analysis focuses on psychometric validation of the rubrics. The paper closes by noting the value of this data for universities and the communities they serve, and the value for scaling to embrace more institutions. Beyond evidence policy and practice need, the paper contributes to a small but flourishing body of research captured below about how universities are engaging with the UN SDGs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tertiary Education and Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-025-09153-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SDG rubrics for higher education: framework design, indicator development, and practical applications

Sara Bice, Hamish Coates, Viraiyan Teeroovengadum, Xi Hong et al.
2 citations
Tertiary Education and Management
Sustainability in Higher Education
17.85
article

SDG rubrics for higher education: framework design, indicator development, and practical applications

Sara Bice, Hamish Coates, Viraiyan Teeroovengadum, Xi Hong, Gwilym Croucher, Ángel Calderón, Liu Liu, Xingrong Huang, Yunan Zhu, Keshav Panray Jungbadoor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports on a multiyear program of international collaborative research delivered with the aim of conceptualising, validating and prototyping rubrics for evaluating and reporting university activities and outcomes relevant to the UN SDGs. The paper sets foundations by building on earlier analysis of research on university engagement with the UN SDGs, and into how the SDGs can be structured conceptually into rubrics for evaluative application. It outlines the design used to articulate the rubrics framework, before presenting results based on data from 30 internationally and institutionally diverse universities. The analysis focuses on psychometric validation of the rubrics. The paper closes by noting the value of this data for universities and the communities they serve, and the value for scaling to embrace more institutions. Beyond evidence policy and practice need, the paper contributes to a small but flourishing body of research captured below about how universities are engaging with the UN SDGs.

Tertiary Education and ManagementVol. 31(1)
Australian National University (AU), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Peking University (CN), University of Mauritius (MU), RMIT University (AU), Tsinghua University (CN)
Australian National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainability in Higher Education
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.