Why Do Citizens Perceive Free and Fair Elections as Fraudulent? The Role of Elite and Media Information Cues

In this article, we investigate why citizens perceive elections with high integrity as fraudulent. We propose an information seeking and processing model to explain variations in citizens’ perceptions of election integrity. We expect the impact of information about election integrity on citizens’ perceptions to vary, first, by the accuracy of sources reporting on the electoral process, and second, by differences in citizens’ seeking and processing information. We test our arguments with National Election Studies data on the Dutch 2021 national parliamentary elections, held under COVID regulations that made concerns about election integrity quite widespread. We find that traditional news media use is associated with more positive perceptions of election integrity, while social media use and exposure to elite cues about election integrity lead to more negative perceptions. We also find that while traditional media use appears to mitigate the winner–loser gap in perceived electoral integrity, social media use exacerbates it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2024.0067
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Do Citizens Perceive Free and Fair Elections as Fraudulent? The Role of Elite and Media Information Cues

Carolien van Ham, Take Sipma, Toine Fiselier
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Media Influence and Politics
article

Why Do Citizens Perceive Free and Fair Elections as Fraudulent? The Role of Elite and Media Information Cues

Carolien van Ham, Take Sipma, Toine Fiselier
article en

Abstract

In this article, we investigate why citizens perceive elections with high integrity as fraudulent. We propose an information seeking and processing model to explain variations in citizens’ perceptions of election integrity. We expect the impact of information about election integrity on citizens’ perceptions to vary, first, by the accuracy of sources reporting on the electoral process, and second, by differences in citizens’ seeking and processing information. We test our arguments with National Election Studies data on the Dutch 2021 national parliamentary elections, held under COVID regulations that made concerns about election integrity quite widespread. We find that traditional news media use is associated with more positive perceptions of election integrity, while social media use and exposure to elite cues about election integrity lead to more negative perceptions. We also find that while traditional media use appears to mitigate the winner–loser gap in perceived electoral integrity, social media use exacerbates it.

Election Law Journal Rules Politics and PolicyVol. 24(2)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Tilburg University (NL), European University Institute (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Do Citizens Perceive Free and Fair Elections as Fraudulent? The Role of Elite and Media Information Cues — Carolien van Ham, Take Sipma, et al. · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS