Techno Economic Evaluation of Different Types of Power Weeder in Chhattisgarh Region

Effective weed management is crucial in contemporary farming practices. As consumers increasingly demand high-quality, safe food products, there is a growing need for non-chemical approaches to weed control in agriculture. This shift has prompted the creation and implementation of alternative weed management techniques that reduce reliance on synthetic herbicides. Among various weeding methods, mechanical approaches are often preferred due to their timeliness, safety, reduced labour, and cost-effectiveness. In Chhattisgarh, where farm sizes per hectare per capita are diminishing over time, it is essential to develop and assess suitable mechanised weeding techniques to address farmers' needs. Hence, a study was done to examine the performance of different types of power weeder viz., power weeder 52 cc (W1), power weeder 67 cc (W2), sidepack brush cutter power weeder (W3), backpack brush cutter power weeder (W4) and solar power cum electric operated (W5) weeder were evaluated for weeding in selected crop fields i.e., mustard, cauliflower and cucumber. The findings indicated that among the power weeders, W5 achieved the highest weeding efficiency (88.6%) in mustard crops, while W1 demonstrated the lowest efficiency (73.8%) in cauliflower crops. The average plant damage percent of power weeders W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 were found to be 1.33 %, 1.43 %, 1.33 %, 1.55 %, and 1.58 %, respectively. The highest plant damage was obtained in W5 and lowest seen in weeder W1 and W3. The weeder W5 had the highest effective field capacity of 0.042 ha/h, while weeder W1 had the lowest effective field capacity of 0.030 ha/h. The field efficiency of weeders in three different crop fields was found to be highest in Weeder W3 (85 %) and lowest in Weeder W1 (79.3 %). The performance index of solar power cum electric operated weeders was found to be the highest (357), while the power weeder 67 cc had the lowest value (95). The initial cost of weeder W5 is highest compared to other weeders. However, variable cost of weeder W5 is low as compared to other selected power weeders. The total operational cost (Rs/ha) of power weeder W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 are 2744.1 Rs/ha, 2611.3 Rs/ha, 2513.9 Rs/ha, 2450.8 Rs/ha and 952.5 Rs/ha respectively. The required total operational energy of weeder W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 are 1643 MJ/ha, 2083 MJ/ha, 1137 MJ/ha, 983 MJ/ha and 3685 MJ/ha. The highest energy required for weeding was observed in weeder W5 and lowest was obtained in W4.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i53000
Primary Topic
Diverse Industrial Engineering Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno Economic Evaluation of Different Types of Power Weeder in Chhattisgarh Region

Jaya Dhruw, V.M. Victor, K. Madhu Malathi
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Diverse Industrial Engineering Technologies
article

Techno Economic Evaluation of Different Types of Power Weeder in Chhattisgarh Region

Jaya Dhruw, V.M. Victor, K. Madhu Malathi
article en

Abstract

Effective weed management is crucial in contemporary farming practices. As consumers increasingly demand high-quality, safe food products, there is a growing need for non-chemical approaches to weed control in agriculture. This shift has prompted the creation and implementation of alternative weed management techniques that reduce reliance on synthetic herbicides. Among various weeding methods, mechanical approaches are often preferred due to their timeliness, safety, reduced labour, and cost-effectiveness. In Chhattisgarh, where farm sizes per hectare per capita are diminishing over time, it is essential to develop and assess suitable mechanised weeding techniques to address farmers' needs. Hence, a study was done to examine the performance of different types of power weeder viz., power weeder 52 cc (W1), power weeder 67 cc (W2), sidepack brush cutter power weeder (W3), backpack brush cutter power weeder (W4) and solar power cum electric operated (W5) weeder were evaluated for weeding in selected crop fields i.e., mustard, cauliflower and cucumber. The findings indicated that among the power weeders, W5 achieved the highest weeding efficiency (88.6%) in mustard crops, while W1 demonstrated the lowest efficiency (73.8%) in cauliflower crops. The average plant damage percent of power weeders W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 were found to be 1.33 %, 1.43 %, 1.33 %, 1.55 %, and 1.58 %, respectively. The highest plant damage was obtained in W5 and lowest seen in weeder W1 and W3. The weeder W5 had the highest effective field capacity of 0.042 ha/h, while weeder W1 had the lowest effective field capacity of 0.030 ha/h. The field efficiency of weeders in three different crop fields was found to be highest in Weeder W3 (85 %) and lowest in Weeder W1 (79.3 %). The performance index of solar power cum electric operated weeders was found to be the highest (357), while the power weeder 67 cc had the lowest value (95). The initial cost of weeder W5 is highest compared to other weeders. However, variable cost of weeder W5 is low as compared to other selected power weeders. The total operational cost (Rs/ha) of power weeder W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 are 2744.1 Rs/ha, 2611.3 Rs/ha, 2513.9 Rs/ha, 2450.8 Rs/ha and 952.5 Rs/ha respectively. The required total operational energy of weeder W1, W2, W3, W4 and W5 are 1643 MJ/ha, 2083 MJ/ha, 1137 MJ/ha, 983 MJ/ha and 3685 MJ/ha. The highest energy required for weeding was observed in weeder W5 and lowest was obtained in W4.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 31(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Diverse Industrial Engineering Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.