ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL ACCORDING TO EUROCODES IN DRAINED AND UNDRAINED CONDITIONS

Retaining cantilever walls are typically designed under drained conditions, assuming that proper drainage is implemented, correctly constructed, and functions throughout the structure's lifespan. However, when appropriate drainage cannot be constructed—such as in walls that cut into and retain a natural slope, where the wall is built adjacent to nearly vertical excavated soil, designers usually rely on effective soil parameters and effective stresses. This paper analyzes a 6 m high cantilever wall retaining different types of backfill soils. Firstly, a non-cohesive, granular soil is considered using effective soil parameters in drained conditions. Next, the analysis is performed under undrained conditions (for example, when drainage fails and the water table is above the footing) using the same soil parameters. Finally, a cohesive, clayey soil is analyzed using total soil parameters in undrained conditions. The results, including the differences in the required dimensions of the wall that satisfy stability conditions in static conditions according to Eurocode 7, are compared. Additionally, all analyses are repeated under seismic conditions using pseudo-static methods to apply horizontal and vertical seismic forces on the structure, in accordance with Eurocode 8.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5592/co/3crocee.2025.78
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL ACCORDING TO EUROCODES IN DRAINED AND UNDRAINED CONDITIONS

Kemal Edip, Vlatko Sheshov, Julijana Bojadjieva, Dejan Ivanovski et al.
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL ACCORDING TO EUROCODES IN DRAINED AND UNDRAINED CONDITIONS

Kemal Edip, Vlatko Sheshov, Julijana Bojadjieva, Dejan Ivanovski, Toni Kitanovski, Jovana Ristova
article en

Abstract

Retaining cantilever walls are typically designed under drained conditions, assuming that proper drainage is implemented, correctly constructed, and functions throughout the structure's lifespan. However, when appropriate drainage cannot be constructed—such as in walls that cut into and retain a natural slope, where the wall is built adjacent to nearly vertical excavated soil, designers usually rely on effective soil parameters and effective stresses. This paper analyzes a 6 m high cantilever wall retaining different types of backfill soils. Firstly, a non-cohesive, granular soil is considered using effective soil parameters in drained conditions. Next, the analysis is performed under undrained conditions (for example, when drainage fails and the water table is above the footing) using the same soil parameters. Finally, a cohesive, clayey soil is analyzed using total soil parameters in undrained conditions. The results, including the differences in the required dimensions of the wall that satisfy stability conditions in static conditions according to Eurocode 7, are compared. Additionally, all analyses are repeated under seismic conditions using pseudo-static methods to apply horizontal and vertical seismic forces on the structure, in accordance with Eurocode 8.

Vol. 3
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL ACCORDING TO EUROCODES IN DRAINED AND UNDRAINED CONDITIONS — Kemal Edip, Vlatko Sheshov, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS