Inter-Rater Variability in Nocifensive Behaviour Testing of Rodents

Chronic pain is a critical health problem with a need for new effective treatments. Nocifensive behaviour testing is used to evaluate animal responses to noxious or painful stimuli and is important in basic pain research for understanding pain mechanisms and developing new treatments. A major problem with this technique, however, is that there can be large differences in baseline measurements even when the same sex and strain of rodent is used. We posit that these differences may be due to variation between testers. This project explored factors that contribute to potential inter-rater variability observed in nocifensive behaviour. Adult Sprague Dawley rats underwent evoked somatosensory testing using von Frey filaments and the simplified up-down (SUDO) approach with two different testers, while other environmental conditions such as location, testing time, and acclimation periods were carefully controlled for. The paw withdrawal threshold between testers was different with baseline scores ranging from 3 g to 18.5 g for individual rats. These results suggest that most observed variation in behavioural outcomes is due to tester differences relative to any other factors. Tester differences that could contribute to this variation include sex, genetics, or odour. These results highlight the importance of maintaining one tester for a series of experiments. We conclude that inter-rater variability is an important factor that must be considered when conducting von Frey nocifensive behaviour testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carleton undergraduate journal of science.
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22215/cujs.v3i2.5123
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-Rater Variability in Nocifensive Behaviour Testing of Rodents

Michael E. Hildebrand, Annemarie Dedek, Emma-Lee Procher, Emma Bondar et al.
Carleton undergraduate journal of science.
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Inter-Rater Variability in Nocifensive Behaviour Testing of Rodents

Michael E. Hildebrand, Annemarie Dedek, Emma-Lee Procher, Emma Bondar, Elaine Marshall
article en

Abstract

Chronic pain is a critical health problem with a need for new effective treatments. Nocifensive behaviour testing is used to evaluate animal responses to noxious or painful stimuli and is important in basic pain research for understanding pain mechanisms and developing new treatments. A major problem with this technique, however, is that there can be large differences in baseline measurements even when the same sex and strain of rodent is used. We posit that these differences may be due to variation between testers. This project explored factors that contribute to potential inter-rater variability observed in nocifensive behaviour. Adult Sprague Dawley rats underwent evoked somatosensory testing using von Frey filaments and the simplified up-down (SUDO) approach with two different testers, while other environmental conditions such as location, testing time, and acclimation periods were carefully controlled for. The paw withdrawal threshold between testers was different with baseline scores ranging from 3 g to 18.5 g for individual rats. These results suggest that most observed variation in behavioural outcomes is due to tester differences relative to any other factors. Tester differences that could contribute to this variation include sex, genetics, or odour. These results highlight the importance of maintaining one tester for a series of experiments. We conclude that inter-rater variability is an important factor that must be considered when conducting von Frey nocifensive behaviour testing.

Carleton undergraduate journal of science.Vol. 3(2)
Dalhousie University (CA), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.