The role of fuel treatments during incident management

Abstract Background Forest fuel reduction treatments are intended to mitigate negative impacts from wildland fires, protect communities, and support firefighting. Understanding fuel treatment use is important for evaluating treatment effectiveness, which, in turn, can inform the strategic planning and design of treatments. A relatively understudied aspect of fuel treatments is how existing fuel treatments are incorporated into firefighting (i.e., incident management). In this paper, we explore how fuel treatments are used by firefighters and Incident Management Teams during fires to inform the broader conversation of designing fuel treatments and assessing fuel treatment effectiveness. Results Through interviews with wildland fire and forest managers (e.g., Incident Commanders, Agency Administrators, Fire Management Officers, and Fuels Planners) on seven western wildfire incidents during 2020 and 2021, we investigated how forest fuel treatments were utilized during firefighting. We found that treatments were considered and used during incidents in various ways, including to conduct burnouts, for direct modification of fire behavior, as access points for firefighters or equipment, or as components of contingency plans. Most interviewees said treatments provided additional options and flexibility in decision-making, enhancing both firefighter and community safety. For instance, treatments were used to reduce overhead hazards to firefighters and, in some cases, were prepared to serve as safety zones. Conclusions The decision to use a fuel treatment was based on several conditions, including the time since the treatment was implemented or maintained, treatment location, incident conditions, and personnel dynamics within the Incident Management Team or local forest unit. We explain what these findings mean in the context of wildland fire decision-making literature. We also provide recommendations for using fuel treatments to support wildfire incident management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Ecology
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-025-00369-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of fuel treatments during incident management

Katie McGrath Novak, S. Michelle Greiner, Courtney A. Schultz, Adam Lohman
2 citations
Fire Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
article

The role of fuel treatments during incident management

Katie McGrath Novak, S. Michelle Greiner, Courtney A. Schultz, Adam Lohman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Forest fuel reduction treatments are intended to mitigate negative impacts from wildland fires, protect communities, and support firefighting. Understanding fuel treatment use is important for evaluating treatment effectiveness, which, in turn, can inform the strategic planning and design of treatments. A relatively understudied aspect of fuel treatments is how existing fuel treatments are incorporated into firefighting (i.e., incident management). In this paper, we explore how fuel treatments are used by firefighters and Incident Management Teams during fires to inform the broader conversation of designing fuel treatments and assessing fuel treatment effectiveness. Results Through interviews with wildland fire and forest managers (e.g., Incident Commanders, Agency Administrators, Fire Management Officers, and Fuels Planners) on seven western wildfire incidents during 2020 and 2021, we investigated how forest fuel treatments were utilized during firefighting. We found that treatments were considered and used during incidents in various ways, including to conduct burnouts, for direct modification of fire behavior, as access points for firefighters or equipment, or as components of contingency plans. Most interviewees said treatments provided additional options and flexibility in decision-making, enhancing both firefighter and community safety. For instance, treatments were used to reduce overhead hazards to firefighters and, in some cases, were prepared to serve as safety zones. Conclusions The decision to use a fuel treatment was based on several conditions, including the time since the treatment was implemented or maintained, treatment location, incident conditions, and personnel dynamics within the Incident Management Team or local forest unit. We explain what these findings mean in the context of wildland fire decision-making literature. We also provide recommendations for using fuel treatments to support wildfire incident management.

Fire EcologyVol. 21(1)
Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.