Assessing and Visualizing Pilot Performance in Traffic Patterns: A Composite Score Approach

Objective measurement of pilot performance has long been a research challenge. This study introduces a new composite score that combines various flight metrics, along with its visual representation through an online application. Thirty general aviation pilots completed flight simulator scenarios under different Flight Rules (VFR: Visual Flight Rules vs. IFR: Instrument Flight Rules) and difficulty levels (Low vs. High). Workload was assessed using subjective and objective indicators. The composite score was developed using flight parameter compliance, approach stability, and landing quality. Workload indicators confirmed the scenario difficulties, showing significant increases under IFR compared to VFR and in High vs. Low difficulty conditions. As predicted by multiple resources theory, the composite score correlated negatively with workload, particularly in IFR conditions, demonstrating its effectiveness in assessing pilot performance. In a follow-up questionnaire, pilots rated the online application positively, highlighting its usefulness in understanding their performance and recognizing its potential for pilot training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11020037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and Visualizing Pilot Performance in Traffic Patterns: A Composite Score Approach

Frédéric Dehais, Quentin Chenot, Sébastien Scannella, Florine Riedinger
2 citations
Safety
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
article

Assessing and Visualizing Pilot Performance in Traffic Patterns: A Composite Score Approach

Frédéric Dehais, Quentin Chenot, Sébastien Scannella, Florine Riedinger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective measurement of pilot performance has long been a research challenge. This study introduces a new composite score that combines various flight metrics, along with its visual representation through an online application. Thirty general aviation pilots completed flight simulator scenarios under different Flight Rules (VFR: Visual Flight Rules vs. IFR: Instrument Flight Rules) and difficulty levels (Low vs. High). Workload was assessed using subjective and objective indicators. The composite score was developed using flight parameter compliance, approach stability, and landing quality. Workload indicators confirmed the scenario difficulties, showing significant increases under IFR compared to VFR and in High vs. Low difficulty conditions. As predicted by multiple resources theory, the composite score correlated negatively with workload, particularly in IFR conditions, demonstrating its effectiveness in assessing pilot performance. In a follow-up questionnaire, pilots rated the online application positively, highlighting its usefulness in understanding their performance and recognizing its potential for pilot training.

SafetyVol. 11(2)
École Nationale de l’Aviation Civile (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut Superieur de l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.