Investigations of the Moon Phobos by Mars Express and Implications Towards Its Origin

Abstract Mars Express has opened a new chapter in the exploration of Phobos, thanks to its elliptical orbit that allows for regular flybys, sometimes as close as 50 km. Initially designed for studying Mars’ surface and atmosphere, its instruments have provided a wealth of data, including precise geophysical bulk parameters, insights into Phobos’ interior, high-resolution images, remote sensing data of its surface, and observations of interactions between Phobos and the space environment. This resurgence of interest in the Martian moons revolves around the fundamental question of how they formed. Despite the abundance of data gathered by Mars Express, Phobos’ surface composition remains uncertain with many unresolved questions. This ambiguity prevents a definitive confirmation or refutation of the asteroid capture scenario, which likens Phobos to a D-type asteroid. This scenario contradicts the current orbits of the moons and poses other dynamical challenges. However, an alternative hypothesis suggests that Phobos and Deimos formed through the accretion of a rocky debris disk in Mars’ orbit. Their refined shapes, low mass, and bulk density support this idea. The non-detection of MARSIS echoes implies a porous interior, aligning with the low bulk density, indicative of high porosity. The next phase of Phobos exploration will be led by JAXA’s Mars Moon eXplorer (MMX) mission, set to quasi-orbit Phobos, land on its surface, and return a sample to Earth in 2029.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Science Reviews
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-025-01165-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigations of the Moon Phobos by Mars Express and Implications Towards Its Origin

Dirk Plettemeier, A. Cicchetti, Alejandro Cardesín‐Moinelo, Sebastian Hegler et al.
3 citations
Space Science Reviews
Planetary Science and Exploration
3.46
article

Investigations of the Moon Phobos by Mars Express and Implications Towards Its Origin

Dirk Plettemeier, A. Cicchetti, Alejandro Cardesín‐Moinelo, Sebastian Hegler, M. Pätzold, Konrad Willner, Olivier Witasse, James L. Godfrey, V. Lainey, Xuanyu Hu, Yoshifumi Futaana, P. Rosenblatt, R. Orosei, Ramona Ziese, Alexander Stark, Klaus‐Dieter Matz, J. Oberst, Tom Andert, T. Duxbury
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mars Express has opened a new chapter in the exploration of Phobos, thanks to its elliptical orbit that allows for regular flybys, sometimes as close as 50 km. Initially designed for studying Mars’ surface and atmosphere, its instruments have provided a wealth of data, including precise geophysical bulk parameters, insights into Phobos’ interior, high-resolution images, remote sensing data of its surface, and observations of interactions between Phobos and the space environment. This resurgence of interest in the Martian moons revolves around the fundamental question of how they formed. Despite the abundance of data gathered by Mars Express, Phobos’ surface composition remains uncertain with many unresolved questions. This ambiguity prevents a definitive confirmation or refutation of the asteroid capture scenario, which likens Phobos to a D-type asteroid. This scenario contradicts the current orbits of the moons and poses other dynamical challenges. However, an alternative hypothesis suggests that Phobos and Deimos formed through the accretion of a rocky debris disk in Mars’ orbit. Their refined shapes, low mass, and bulk density support this idea. The non-detection of MARSIS echoes implies a porous interior, aligning with the low bulk density, indicative of high porosity. The next phase of Phobos exploration will be led by JAXA’s Mars Moon eXplorer (MMX) mission, set to quasi-orbit Phobos, land on its surface, and return a sample to Earth in 2029.

Space Science ReviewsVol. 221(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Swedish Institute of Space Physics (SE), European Space Operations Centre (DE), George Mason University (US), Université de Lille (FR), Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE), European Space Astronomy Centre (ES), Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology (IT), Istituto di Radioastronomia di Bologna (IT), Rhenish Institute for Environmental Research (DE), Institut für Lungenforschung (DE), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), National Institute for Astrophysics (IT)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Swedish National Space Agency, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Freie Universität Berlin, Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Planetary Science and Exploration
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.