The Regulation of Change Orders in Jordanian Contract Law and Its Reform

This study investigates the nature, origins, and legal framework of change orders (COs) in contracts, focusing on Jordanian law. Adopting a diagnostic approach, the article evaluates legal texts related to regulatory frameworks and identifies gaps in current legislation. The results indicate that deficiencies in Jordanian law and specialized provisions governing COs create conflicts between common contract amendment rules and the unique needs of construction-related COs. This article holds significant importance for the legal and scientific communities, as it thoroughly analyzes COs and recommends reforms to protect the rights of contracting partners. This investigation emphasizes the necessity of adopting detailed, CO-specific FIDIC contracts. Additionally, it proposes that contracting partners incorporate FIDIC’s foundational terms to ensure clarity and fairness in CO usage. By addressing these legal and practical challenges, this study contributes to more efficient contract management, reduced disputes, and enhanced legal certainty in project construction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics Management and Trade
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2025/v31i51285
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Regulation of Change Orders in Jordanian Contract Law and Its Reform

Othman Nsour
Journal of Economics Management and Trade
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

The Regulation of Change Orders in Jordanian Contract Law and Its Reform

Othman Nsour
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the nature, origins, and legal framework of change orders (COs) in contracts, focusing on Jordanian law. Adopting a diagnostic approach, the article evaluates legal texts related to regulatory frameworks and identifies gaps in current legislation. The results indicate that deficiencies in Jordanian law and specialized provisions governing COs create conflicts between common contract amendment rules and the unique needs of construction-related COs. This article holds significant importance for the legal and scientific communities, as it thoroughly analyzes COs and recommends reforms to protect the rights of contracting partners. This investigation emphasizes the necessity of adopting detailed, CO-specific FIDIC contracts. Additionally, it proposes that contracting partners incorporate FIDIC’s foundational terms to ensure clarity and fairness in CO usage. By addressing these legal and practical challenges, this study contributes to more efficient contract management, reduced disputes, and enhanced legal certainty in project construction.

Journal of Economics Management and TradeVol. 31(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.